Guess the RHP member

@fmf said
Then don't ask him. Just try to figure out who those hundreds of posters supposedly were.

So your answer would be a no! 🙂 Why not just say that to start with?

-VR

@very-rusty said
So your answer would be a no! 🙂 Why not just say that to start with?

-VR

Because Suzanne's conspiracy theory was completely paranoid and demented and if you are so intent on making a fool of yourself, so be it.

@fmf said
Because Suzanne's conspiracy theory was completely paranoid and demented and if you are so intent on making a fool of yourself, so be it.

I see so now Suzie Q's theory was completely paranoid and demented and I am making a fool of my self because I asked you a simple question. Then you say others can't give yes or no answers when you can't do so yourself. What would you call that?

-VR

@very-rusty said
I see so now Suzie Q's theory was completely paranoid and demented and I am making a fool of my self because I asked you a simple question.

Spot on

@very-rusty said
Then you say others can't give yes or no answers when you can't do so yourself. What would you call that?

I'd call that - above - another 20 gormless words courtesy of you.

@fmf said
I'd call that - above - another 20 gormless words courtesy of you.

Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Synonyms & Antonyms for gormless
airheaded,
birdbrained,
bonehead,
boneheaded,
brain-dead,
brainless,
bubbleheaded,
chuckleheaded,

I see a few in there that could be you, but how did you mean it concerning me! 😛 😉

-VR

@kewpie said
I saw the thread title and took a look. 72 posts and not a single one worth reading. Where's the entertaining word game promised by the title?
I should have looked at the thread creator's name first. My bad.

This post I agree with. I'm not the only one thinking there is less here than meets the eye.

It started with this thread, and now the infection has spread.

I'll leave everyone to decipher what the common theme is of these threads.

Some people just don't understand not to go on and on and on and on for pages and pages in a battle of wits with the unarmed. They even look to increase their "readership" with more of the same trash-talking nonsense, wrapped in a defensive cloak of "principle". As if.


And no, I'm not Nostradamus, I don't talk just to call "gloom and doom".

I call things as I see them. If others disagree, so be it. They can blow their own horn as long and as loudly as they want. And I'll still be here to call their music horrible, because it is. Not because of "who" they are, but because of their fragile ego. Selfishness disguised as "principle", vengeful retribution wrapped up as "righteous indignation". I've heard this music before. The record never changes.

@suzianne said
This post I agree with. I'm not the only one thinking there is less here than meets the eye.

It started with this thread, and now the infection has spread.

I'll leave everyone to decipher what the common theme is of these threads.

Some people just don't understand not to go on and on and on and on for pages and pages in a battle of wits with the unarmed. They even ...[text shortened]... ion wrapped up as "righteous indignation". I've heard this music before. The record never changes.

You can continue to blow your own horn for as long as you wish Suzie Q.

Do you think you are pefect?

-VR

@suzianne said
I'm not the only one thinking there is less here than meets the eye.

There are dozens of active threads across several forums, if you don’t like this one you should not feel obliged to either read it nor post in it.

@suzianne said
It started with this thread, and now the infection has spread.

What infection?

@suzianne said
Some people just don't understand not to go on and on and on and on for pages and pages in a battle of wits with the unarmed. They even look to increase their "readership" with more of the same trash-talking nonsense, wrapped in a defensive cloak of "principle".

You really should just ignore the posts or even the threads which don’t meet your standard.

@suzianne said
I call things as I see them.

Your “calling it” is highly dependent on who the callee is. If it’s one of your buddies they you rarely “call it” at all, except perhaps posthumously as you did in the case of you criticising Grampy Bobby’s overuse of CS Lewis.

@suzianne said
Selfishness disguised as "principle", vengeful retribution wrapped up as "righteous indignation". I've heard this music before. The record never changes.

“Vengeful retribution”

You’ve seen this in this thread, or elsewhere?

@suzianne said
And no, I'm not Nostradamus, I don't talk just to call "gloom and doom".I call things as I see them.

Which threads that you started - out of, say, the 60 most recent General Forum threads - demonstrate what kind of content you'd like to see on this forum?

@fmf said
Which threads that you started - out of, say, the 60 most recent General Forum threads - demonstrate what kind of content you'd like to see on this forum?

Suzianne, make that the 500 most recent threads. Which ones that you started reflect your vision and standard for this forum? Have you started any threads in the last year?