- Joined
- 14 Mar 04
- Moves
- 188366
19 Oct 12
Originally posted by tomtom232A serious question then. (I know, "what, serious from GBS?"😉 Why do you post here if it annoys you?
I've been here longer than him. I'm well aware of his posting habbits. They aren't the greatest and they do annoy me at times but that is true of EVERY SINGLE USER HERE. Myself included. Yes, I annoy myself by even posting here anymore.
19 Oct 12
Originally posted by tomtom232Surely you mean everyone but me... right?
I've been here longer than him. I'm well aware of his posting habbits. They aren't the greatest and they do annoy me at times but that is true of EVERY SINGLE USER HERE. Myself included. Yes, I annoy myself by even posting here anymore.
RIGHT?!~
As for your check of GB's posts, right off the bat I found his chocolate thread.
He compares the forum users to high school students in his condescending fashion.
He closes with "Maybe such a person just doesn't have enough family, friends, sex or chocolate in his life."
Now, we are to assume anyone who has a problem with GB's typical garbage either has no friends, family, sex... or not enough chocolate? This is GB laying blame on others for HIS behavior. He takes no responsibility for the way he behaves in these forums and blames everyone else.
But you don't see it, so no sense in discussing it further I guess.
19 Oct 12
Originally posted by PhlabibitHey, I identify with the not having enough chocolate in life. There is no such thing as too much chocolate, humanitys greatest gift to itself and a far greater discovery than the peanut. Uh oh... Chocolate and peanuts, now I really am in a hunger crisis...
As for your check of GB's posts, right off the bat I found his chocolate thread.
He compares the forum users to high school students in his condescending fashion.
He closes with "Maybe such a person just doesn't have enough family, friends, sex or chocolate in his life."
Now, we are to assume anyone who has a problem with GB's typical garbage eith ...[text shortened]... ames everyone else.
But you don't see it, so no sense in discussing it further I guess.
Originally posted by PhlabibitWow really? How many much more blatant insults were flung about by the likes of darvlay yet everybody loved him?
As for your check of GB's posts, right off the bat I found his chocolate thread.
He compares the forum users to high school students in his condescending fashion.
He closes with "Maybe such a person just doesn't have enough family, friends, sex or chocolate in his life."
Now, we are to assume anyone who has a problem with GB's typical garbage eith ...[text shortened]... ames everyone else.
But you don't see it, so no sense in discussing it further I guess.
Get off of your high horse please. Everybody just needs to leave him alone... I don't really care for him or the forum but I do enjoy coming and reading threads. It is much easier to sift through one user posting "garbage" than 10 users posting garbage in response to said user.
19 Oct 12
Originally posted by tomtom232Really. Don't act so surprised.
Wow really? How many much more blatant insults were flung about by the likes of darvlay yet everybody loved him?
Get off of your high horse please. Everybody just needs to leave him alone... I don't really care for him or the forum but I do enjoy coming and reading threads. It is much easier to sift through one user posting "garbage" than 10 users posting garbage in response to said user.
fo·rum noun \ˈfȯr-əm\
plural forums also fo·ra
Definition of FORUM
1
a : the marketplace or public place of an ancient Roman city forming the center of judicial and public business
b : a public meeting place for open discussion
c : a medium (as a newspaper or online service) of open discussion or expression of ideas
2
: a judicial body or assembly : court
3
a : a public meeting or lecture involving audience discussion
b : a program (as on radio or television) involving discussion of a problem usually by several authorities
See forum defined for English-language learners »
See forum defined for kids »
You see the problem is Bob must be using the 1.b: definition whereas many here are using the 2 definition. Okay maybe Bob uses 3 a or b, I dunno, never mind this interruption of your witch hunt, as you were. 😞