Originally posted by CrowleyWell, it seems Rusty doesn't have an answer when confronted about the lies he spews all over the place.
Oh, a wonderful cop-out by Very Rusty.
I shoot your flimsy little 'argument' into smithereens, then you pretend to leave in a huff.
Well, if that was all you have I'm kind of disappointed.
I've received warnings before, as I've lost my cool before. You know what I did? I messaged Russ back, apologized and got on with enjoying this site, instead of whining about it in the forums like a little bloody girl.
I'll take your silence in this matter as a 'victory' and apology.
Apology accepted, "buddy".
Originally posted by CrowleyCrowley, really do not know you but must say that your objective posts
Well, it seems Rusty doesn't have an answer when confronted about the lies he spews all over the place.
I'll take your silence in this matter as a 'victory' and apology.
Apology accepted, "buddy".
have validated the unstated purpose and real intent of this thread. -gb
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyCharge more for subscription and institute an IQ test requiiste to membership.
If you were Russ...
If you were Russ and/or Chris, how would you approach short and long term resolution of RHP Site moderation issues?
One simple courtesy request: Please find other sandboxes to jest, fixate and fight in. Only thoughtful replies go here.
Thanks.
😉
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhat i find objectional, is your bumping 12 threads, just so you can impose your personal agenda for the forum. If everyone did this who thought they were right, the forum would be a never ending set of block threads.
Huck, may I ask which thread/conversations you find uninteresting and therefore objectionable? Stating reason why, of course, is optional.
It's not your job to decide what should be in the forum. If some kids/adults decide to have a purile day, it's not for you to edit the forum in your way to make it as you see fit.
If you do ity again, i will be sending feedback to Russ, and/or gathering some other likeminded people to do the same as you, thus shoing exactly how wrong your actions are. I'm guessing a few of us constantly bumping poop jokes should be enough to get the point across.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundYou make your point, Huck. Your threats are noted. Believe members may still respond to posts. Kill gb's threads by not posting to them.
What i find objectional, is your bumping 12 threads, just so you can impose your personal agenda for the forum. If everyone did this who thought they were right, the forum would be a never ending set of block threads.
It's not your job to decide what should be in the forum. If some kids/adults decide to have a purile day, it's not for you to ed guessing a few of us constantly bumping poop jokes should be enough to get the point across.
😀
I'm not reading this inevitable bus crash of a thread, but would suggest a 'cooler forum' that can only be used by those serving bans and the forum mods + Russ and Chris.
Some may see it as a dojo, some as an antiforum, some may try to get banned to visit it, whatever anyone in there would be able to discuss their ban with the mod team.
It'd have to be done in a way that others with bans couldn't read threads not of their own. I'm sure that's something an IT whizz could make happen.
Maybe a PM 'distribution list' to include all mods + R + C would suffice.
[/idea] Please continue with petty arguments and humourous thuggery.
To change to mod system though takes time, and time = money for any business. If i were Russ, i'd not invest in overhauling something on the back of the costant whinging of less than 10 of my customer base. I'd sit back and chuckle to myself that some of this minority actually pay me so they can also whinge in private forums about this.
[/insight] whinge-boxes at your ready... 😉