Originally posted by Very Rustyexcellent. time to start the bidding war between the publishers and start writing the acceptance speeches for the awards i (<cough> i mean, we) are sure to receive. good idea to get an early start on the sequel.
I am keeping a little blackbook on your potshots at GB and it is pretty well filled up already. I may soon have to start little blackbook2
Originally posted by BlackampI am going to need a publisher & writter, plus a villain to play you.
excellent. time to start the bidding war between the publishers and start writing the acceptance speeches for the awards i (<cough> i mean, we) are sure to receive. good idea to get an early start on the sequel.
Originally posted by Very Rustyif by 'villain' you mean 'dashing hero', i'm right with you. of course, some of the characters will mistakenly see Blackamp as the villain, but in the final act, they'll be shown to be the tards they really are and will, at last, see the light.
I am going to need a publisher & writter, plus a villain to play you.
Originally posted by Very Rustyit's too bad Grampa Simpson is just a cartoon character. no, wait! it fits! maybe we could mix animation with real actors, like in Who Framed Roger Rabbit.
The dashing hero is of course GB who will need no one to play him.
Grampa Simpson as GB, and i'm thinking maybe Edward Norton as Blackamp. who would you like to play VR?
Originally posted by BlackampPerhaps we should all just play ourselves!
it's too bad Grampa Simpson is just a cartoon character. no, wait! it fits! maybe we could mix animation with real actors, like in Who Framed Roger Rabbit.
Grampa Simpson as GB, and i'm thinking maybe Edward Norton as Blackamp. who would you like to play VR?
Originally posted by Very Rustywhatever gets the creative juices flowing.
Perhaps we should all just play with ourselves!
btw, if anyone is tempted to alert this, go right ahead. there has been inconsistent modding on this issue. i've sent feedback through the proper channels, and pointed out examples where edited text has been allowed to stand even tho it changed the meaning of the original text, and received nothing by way of clarification. so i guess it has to be done the hard way.
edit: it just struck me how wickedly clever the first part of this post is. it would be a shame if it got modded out of existence.
Originally posted by BlackampIt is quite obvious that you changed the quote. So everyone knows I didn't say it.
whatever gets the creative juices flowing.
btw, if anyone is tempted to alert this, go right ahead. there has been inconsistent modding on this issue. i've sent feedback through the proper channels, and pointed out examples where edited text has been allowed to stand even tho it changed the meaning of the original text, and received nothing by way of ...[text shortened]... y clever the first part of this post is. it would be a shame if it got modded out of existence.
I think the question here is it ok for 13+ children.
Wouldn't we need to know what you mean by play with ourselves.
Solitaire, etc., etc,