Originally posted by FreakyKBHHmm, yet even though it was mlprior that pointed out that gb was pretentious, you choose to pick on starrman for your pack mentality jollies...i find this interesting.
A toxin produces poison which is deleterious to the overall health of any given organism. Assuming the community of this website is that organism, you are apparently of the mind that the health of the same will only be achievable once everyone is like you.
What a tard.
Originally posted by StarrmanAs usual Freaky you're incapable of grasping the logical flow of an argument.
As usual Freaky you're incapable of grasping the logical flow of an argument. Your argument amounts to: anyone who disagrees with a bad apple in the forum must want every poster to be exactly the same as him, which is pure nonsense. GB does nothing constructive for this forum, never has. While he was on his ban there was a better atmosphere, more co-oper ...[text shortened]... se, I must be a retard to want him gone because that means everyone should be just like me...🙄
Would you mind typing slower? It's hard for me to keep up sometimes.
Your argument amounts to: anyone who disagrees with a bad apple in the forum must want every poster to be exactly the same as him, which is pure nonsense.
Nah. I just disagree with your assessment of what constitutes a bad apple. I guess that's my lack of self-righteousness seeping out. My bad.
GB does nothing constructive for this forum, never has.
The fact that he can get you and others like you positively swirling with the slightest stroke of his keyboard--- for me--- brings immeasurable levity and near-joy.
While he was on his ban there was a better atmosphere, more co-operative projects, pleasant discourse and less bickering.
Bull feces. The forum was homogeneously bland, and much less interaction.
As soon as he returns people are sniping again.
Leader that you are, it began with... YOU!
But of course, I must be a retard to want him gone because that means everyone should be just like me...🙄
See above repsonses.
Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Nah. I just disagree with your assessment of what constitutes a bad apple. I guess that's my lack of self-righteousness seeping out. My bad.
That's not what you said, you claimed I was a retard for wanting everyone to be just like me, something I had in no way done. If you wished to offer a purely pro-GB stance, you could have done so, but that was not your intention, don't pretend it was.
The fact that he can get you and others like you positively swirling with the slightest stroke of his keyboard--- for me--- brings immeasurable levity and near-joy.
Why is that?
Bull feces. The forum was homogeneously bland, and much less interaction.
You seem to be judging the worthiness of interaction upon how much irritation there is between people. What a poor scale on which to judge enjoyment.
Leader that you are, it began with... YOU!
Hardly, I wasn't the first to place an anti-GB opinion here since his return and I won't be the last. I assume now that you are the sender of his 15 daily PMs.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundGee... thanks for the endorsement... You make me sound like Palynka! 🙂
Well i guess that you and your gang have an agenda to attack certain people and not others. At least starrman is consistant on attacking pretty much everybody he sees as dumb 😛
Originally posted by StarrmanThat's not what you said, you claimed I was a retard for wanting everyone to be just like me, something I had in no way done.
Originally posted by FreakyKBH
Nah. I just disagree with your assessment of what constitutes a bad apple. I guess that's my lack of self-righteousness seeping out. My bad.
That's not what you said, you claimed I was a retard for wanting everyone to be just like me, something I had in no way done. If you wished to offer a purely pro-GB stanc ...[text shortened]... return and I won't be the last. I assume now that you are the sender of his 15 daily PMs.[/b]
I recall using the word "apparently."
If you wished to offer a purely pro-GB stance, you could have done so, but that was not your intention, don't pretend it was.
I was not offering a pro-GB stance, so there's no reason to pretend, thanks. I am offering the ribald position that the health of the forum is the free, thoughtful and thought-provoking dialogue of folks from all backgrounds/positions.
Why is that?
Which part? Why he causes such consternation or why I get such jollies from the same?
You seem to be judging the worthiness of interaction upon how much irritation there is between people. What a poor scale on which to judge enjoyment.
No, I was making my assessment based upon the general blandness (read: sameness) to the conversations.
I assume now that you are the sender of his 15 daily PMs.
I don't follow what you mean here. If, by "PM," you mean private message, I've not sent any on behalf of anyone. Besides, every time I've received one, the message always tells me the sender. How would it be any different for you, exactly?
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundThat's actually true. I just think that there's a difference between hitting a piñata and hitting a person.
Well i guess that you and your gang have an agenda to attack certain people and not others. At least starrman is consistant on attacking pretty much everybody he sees as dumb 😛
Originally posted by FreakyKBH
I recall using the word "apparently."
Seriously, you think that changes the intention of your post at all? How does 'what a tard' affect that 'apparently' useage?
I was not offering a pro-GB stance, so there's no reason to pretend, thanks. I am offering the ribald position that the health of the forum is the free, thoughtful and thought-provoking dialogue of folks from all backgrounds/positions.
Well then you need to reconsider how you approach it, because at the moment, you're pretty much coming across as his posterboy.
Why he causes such consternation or why I get such jollies from the same?
This part, obviously.
No, I was making my assessment based upon the general blandness (read: sameness) to the conversations.
Since we had already established that him being here had caused more irritations, and you yourself had admitted that you loved when he gets other people's backs up, how is it that you have at any point in this thread promoted the free, thoughtful and thought-provoking dialogue of folks from all backgrounds/positions with him returning to the forum?
Originally posted by avalanchethecatYou've been here how long? Same old acts get tired after time.
I don't generally find much in Freaky's arguments to side with, but I'm with him on this - aren't the forums just so much more vibrant and entertaining when there's a bit of healthy disagreement on the menu?
P-
Originally posted by avalanchethecatI suppose that depends on what we could do together if there wasn't a GB presence here. I remember when the forums were like that and I'm not wishing for nostalgic return to the golden ages or anything, I just think there's a way to get a colaborative, and vibrantly entertaining forum, without the upset which GB brings.
I don't generally find much in Freaky's arguments to side with, but I'm with him on this - aren't the forums just so much more vibrant and entertaining when there's a bit of healthy disagreement on the menu?
Originally posted by avalanchethecatImagine someone posting 10-15 threads (the first page only holds 30 threads, so that's 1/3-1/2 the page) about the almightiest drivel, then playing a game of keep-up with them at the cost of toher people who want to find things out, or use the forum for it's intended use...Meet Grampy Bobby, our resident troll. Under the bridge of the general forum since 2007.
I don't generally find much in Freaky's arguments to side with, but I'm with him on this - aren't the forums just so much more vibrant and entertaining when there's a bit of healthy disagreement on the menu?