06 Oct 05
Originally posted by rhbThere is nothing stopping RHP having two informal evenings.
http://www.timeforchess.com/vote/result.php?voteid=8
Tied at 18 each right now... something needs to be done!
We could obviously meet on both nights. Not necessarily the same people, I cant make the 26th, but it would be good to meet some of you even if the starrman is not around.
So why not say there are two London Meets, both will have at least 18 internet chess freaks there and that come more merrier.
If people have a good time at the first I'm sure more will come to the second.
Everyone is happy!
06 Oct 05
Originally posted by invigorateI second the motion
There is nothing stopping RHP having two informal evenings.
We could obviously meet on both nights. Not necessarily the same people, I cant make the 26th, but it would be good to meet some of you even if the starrman is not around.
So why not say there are two London Meets, both will have at least 18 internet chess freaks there and that come more ...[text shortened]... ople have a good time at the first I'm sure more will come to the second.
Everyone is happy!
06 Oct 05
Originally posted by shavixmirHmmm... the 26th is now 1 ahead.
I certainly hope a decision is made soon, as to when it's going to be held.
All this suspense is killing me....and the fish 'n' chips are-a-waitin'!!!
http://www.timeforchess.com/vote/result.php?voteid=8
Another point about the vote. Is there anyway Russ can show that the votes were from peeps generally interested in attending. For example, I could hypothetically get some buddies from across the pond to vote for my preferred choice of date so as to skew the result in my favour.
(this is hypothetical in my case as we all know Gingers don't have buddies 🙄).
