10 Dec 08
Originally posted by SeitseYou have really changed since joining the PFC.
I think Red Night has lots of wonderful ideas to open his own chess site and be the king there.
Why not helping him with a permanent ban?
Do the TOS include some sort of "for being an idiot" reason for a ban?
if we were handing out bans for racism, your avatar might win one.
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by PalynkaSo you think it's bad to treat people abusively as a general principle, but when it's boiled down to the individual level then all manner of abuse is fair game. Or is it just OK to treat people badly when YOU are the one dishing out the abuse?
Exactly. I have no problem with mocking individuals like Suzi, yet I have a problem with prolonging negative stereotypes that affect indiscriminately a whole group of heterogeneous individuals.
The fun part is that you think these are the same.
I don't see anything fun or funny about harassment, whether it's done on a grand scale or one-on-one (or in this case two-on-one). Frankly I think both of you should be permanently removed from the site. You've clearly violated the TOS and continue to harass a person who has made it abundantly clear that they wish this harassment to end. And you call this fun.
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by leisurelyslothI agree 100%
You may think you're so terribly smart but your comments aren't going over anyone's head. Your slimy support of Ragnorak's sleaze campaign is clear for everyone to see. The irony here is that you two continually harass her and then pretend to be so caring about racist abuse. Ironic that you support Luck's banning over TWO racist statements when you two pieces of garbage have a history of YEARS of abuse.
palynka wants it both ways. 😉
He wants to decide who he can abuse and who others can't.
Frankly, he's another one that changed for the worse after joining the PFC. Sad really.
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by Red NightThe PFC ate my brain. It's all potAtoes now.
You have really changed since joining the PFC.
if we were handing out bans for racism, your avatar might win one.
I won't even discuss your idiotic comment about my avatar. How do you know I am not a black pimp who follows krishna, teaches literature at the local university, and does community work, uh?
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by leisurelyslothSend feedback or alert my posts if you feel that way.
So you think it's bad to treat people abusively as a general principle, but when it's boiled down to the individual level then all manner of abuse is fair game. Or is it just OK to treat people badly when YOU are the one dishing out the abuse?
I don't see anything fun or funny about harassment, whether it's done on a grand scale or one-on-one (or ...[text shortened]... has made it abundantly clear that they wish this harassment to end. And you call this fun.
I usually send a barbed comment when I feel the post deserved it. If the person that receives makes his answer personal then, as far as I'm concerned, it's fair game.
Unlike you, I don't think Suzianne needs protection from my comments. She has responded in kind, time and time again. If she had not, then one might have called it harassment (even though I would have stopped long before it reached such levels). Like this, I call it fun.
10 Dec 08
1 edit
Originally posted by Red NightI changed my attitude towards you, long after I was in PFC but not because of it. It was not the PFC who made me change my mind, it was you.
I agree 100%
palynka wants it both ways. 😉
He wants to decide who he can abuse and who others can't.
Frankly, he's another one that changed for the worse after joining the PFC. Sad really.
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by PalynkaLOL! Alert your posts? What a farce. So that your buddies on the mod team will hide your sleaze? No I think it best to leave it out in the open where everyone can see it.
Send feedback or alert my posts if you feel that way.
I usually send a barbed comment when I feel the post deserved it. If the person that receives makes his answer personal then, as far as I'm concerned, it's fair game.
Unlike you, I don't think Suzianne needs protection from my comments. She has responded in kind, time and time again. If she had not, ...[text shortened]... en though I would have stopped long before it reached such levels). Like this, I call it fun.
Don't pretend to tell me what I think. I've never said Suzi needs protection. She's more than capable of taking care of herself. However, she HAS repeatedly requested that this treatment be stopped. If you missed it, then I suggest you check out her statement on page 13 of Thread 104560. I don't know how she could possibly have made it any more clear that these statements are unwelcome.