10 Dec 08
2 edits
Originally posted by leisurelyslothThat was directed at Ragnorak. As far as I know, she hasn't extended such an offer to me.
LOL! Alert your posts? What a farce. So that your buddies on the mod team will hide your sleaze? No I think it best to leave it out in the open where everyone can see it.
Don't pretend to tell me what I think. I've never said Suzi needs protection. She's more than capable of taking care of herself. However, she HAS repeatedly requested that know how she could possibly have made it any more clear that these statements are unwelcome.
More than likely because either the comments are less in quantity/quality/aggressiveness than Rag's or she actually sees my posts for what they are.
Edit - In case you still haven't found out, I don't doubt Suzi is female.
Edit 2 - But I do doubt she sees my posts for what they are. Such is life.
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by PalynkaOh, so you read that to mean that she doesn't appreciate Ragnorak's abuse, but she's really grooving on yours?
That was directed at Ragnorak. As far as I know, she hasn't extended such an offer to me.
More than likely because either the comments are less in quantity/quality/aggressiveness than Rag's or she actually sees my posts for what they are.
Edit - In case you still haven't found out, I don't doubt Suzi is female.
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by leisurelyslothHow did I "abuse" her? With that single post? You really have no sense of proportion.
Oh, so you read that to mean that she doesn't appreciate Ragnorak's abuse, but she's really grooving on yours?
I read that to mean that she doesn't care about my "abuse" as much as she cares about Rag's posts. Personally, I don't see how I "abuse" her. Banter? Sure. Provocation? Definitely. Abuse? Not at all.
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by PalynkaIt stops being banter or provocation when someone says that it's unwelcome and they want it to stop. At that point the "sense of proportion" is not relevant. And it's not just a one time deal as you're claiming. You made similar comments in the other thread.
How did I "abuse" her? With that single post? You really have no sense of proportion.
I read that to mean that she doesn't care about my "abuse" as much as she cares about Rag's posts. Personally, I don't see how I "abuse" her. Banter? Sure. Provocation? Definitely. Abuse? Not at all.
10 Dec 08
1 edit
Originally posted by leisurelyslothAll I'm saying is that it's not up to you to decide if she sees my posts as abuse or not.
It stops being banter or provocation when someone says that it's unwelcome and they want it to stop. At that point the "sense of proportion" is not relevant. And it's not just a one time deal as you're claiming. You made similar comments in the other thread.
Edit - Sure, she has said that she doesn't find them funny and, at least, implied that they are unwelcome. But abuse is more than unwelcome posts.
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by PalynkaYup. Ultimately I'm not the arbiter of what is and isn't abuse. Be glad for that, because you'd be looking for a new place to play chess right now if I were.
All I'm saying is that it's not up to you to decide if she sees my posts as abuse or not.
Edit - Sure, she has said that she doesn't find them funny and, at least, implied that they are unwelcome. But abuse is more than unwelcome posts.
What is your definition of abuse? Do you have to hunt her down personally and punch her in the nose before you'd consider it abuse? Repeated posts which attack her personally in a way that she's said is unwelcome don't meet your definition?
10 Dec 08
Originally posted by leisurelyslothI just think you're just lumping me with Rags. He has his own motives and I'm not here to attack or defend him. Like I said, I think Suzi can speak for herself and I don't see myself in the same category as Rags. I might be wrong, of course.
Yup. Ultimately I'm not the arbiter of what is and isn't abuse. Be glad for that, because you'd be looking for a new place to play chess right now if I were.
What is your definition of abuse? Do you have to hunt her down personally and punch her in the nose before you'd consider it abuse? Repeated posts which attack her personally in a way that she's said is unwelcome don't meet your definition?
10 Dec 08
I did not find Hari's terse and to the point posts as obnoxious as many others on this site. He at least kept his posts short! I found some biting, but often right on target. I have often wondered why certain people can be targeted and maligned freely if they fall into certain categories. Being someone who fits into several categories that are commonly attacked freely without impugnity, I only take it to mean that the RHP owners are in consensus with the attackers.