Originally posted by SuzianneIt might be quite the leap 😉
Well, this is fairly unwarranted.
Why is any sort of female attention considered "obsession" by men? And why must it always be connected to sexual attraction?
Please, leave this Neanderthal attitude behind and step boldly into the 21st century.
Ummmm....Suzianne? I don't know how to tell you this? It is not our posts that Dive doesn't like. It really is us. 😞
I know, I know...he will tell you that he is really just responding to what a person posts and that it is not the actual poster he has a problem with....but I am hear to tell you...he is fibbing 😳
*sigh*
Originally posted by Landisqueen170Well, like I said, posters like Suzianne and lemon lime and robbie carrobie call me a liar all the time.
Both FMF and Dive acknowledged that Seitse's posts are typically insulting and offensive in nature. They both said they have confronted him on this. Just as they have confronted GB.Yet, neither can produce just one example of "confronting" Seitse. Not one between the two of them.
Originally posted by Landisqueen170I'm not insinuating anything, I'm saying I have a feeling you are. That is being direct, to the point and honest. Insinuating would be saying something like "hey how much do you bench?" or something similar.
Hmmmm- - wonder if you just thumbed me down....not too obvious or anything 😉
You are the one that took issue with me today - right from the start.
You insist that it is the "post" that you respond to, not the "poster." I find that hard to believe. You don't like anything I say, ever, and it is that simple.
You have said several times that ...[text shortened]... think that is a very disingenuous way to be, if you are, in fact, a man of the Christian faith.
Originally posted by SuzianneSo, another example of you not calling out a poster over their behaviour because you like them and can find an excuse to pass over their posts. You really are something.
I know Seitse better than most posters here, and I can tell you (just between us 🙂 ) that he is primarily "in it" only "for the lulz". He's not really like that, but then, this IS the internet. If he really was like that, I'd be on him like I'm always on these other men to behave.
Originally posted by SuzianneI've confronted him many times too; it is you who choose not too confront him, the same way you choose not to confront Grampy Bobby.
I have to stop you here. And this is dive's problem too.
[b]Not everyone sees things the same as you. Your opinion is not the "gold" standard.[/b]
20 Dec 15
Originally posted by SuzianneSo you feel my "Neanderthal quality" is worth calling me out over? Perhaps if you got to know me a little better, like you say that know seitse, would you feel that it's ok for me to be Neanderthal because I too am doing it just for the "lulz"?
Well, this is fairly unwarranted.
Why is any sort of female attention considered "obsession" by men? And why must it always be connected to sexual attraction?
Please, leave this Neanderthal attitude behind and step boldly into the 21st century.
20 Dec 15
Originally posted by SuzianneJust because I think a poster is not what they claim to be does not give you the right insult me with an ad hominem. It's my opinion and I'm entitled to hold it. I don't think I am the only one either.
And what, exactly, does she have to do to "qualify" as a female in your pea brain?
This should be good.
Originally posted by SuzianneBut last night you were caught bang to rights, underwear at your ankles in full Robbie Carrobie style for admitting that you don't call Grampy Bobby out on the horrible things he says because you feel it's part of his religious beliefs.
Hear, hear.
I guess he's still smarting from last night when I disagreed with him. He doesn't take that well. And then to be confronted with yet another woman speaking her mind! OMG!
Guilty of this kind of sexism and yet he still thinks the greatest crime on the internet is not agreeing with him. Unbelievable.