Memo

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Firstly could you point to where I have 'attacked' Roberts religion, secondly where I have 'attacked' him and thirdly where I have been hypocritical with respect to Roberts right to worship?

Originally posted by FMF
Who has suggested that there should be any restrictions on people's right to worship as they choose?

Rather than the focus being his religion, I instead think the salient points here have been [1] whether criticism or a lack of support constitutes an attack on the freedom of the person being criticized, and [2] whether criticism, a lack of support, or a lack of positive comments constitute bigotry. I'd say 'no' in answer to both points.

Originally posted by Startreader
Hypocrite.

Remind your sidekick to add that to his pathetic list.

Originally posted by FMF
This is just you dodging the content of my post. 😕

It's as if you have no interest whatsoever in any of the things that anyone discusses here. 😀

Originally posted by Startreader
Do you have any mode of speech other than permanent sneer?

You're correct in thinking I have absolutely no interest in anything you have to say about anything because you are either in sneer, bully, or pretend prosecuting counsel mode.

This does not extent to Captain Strange. Just you and your Siamese twin.

“We are all born rude. No infant has ever appeared yet with the grace to understand how inconsiderate it is to disturb others in the middle of the night.”
―Judith Martin, Common Courtesy: In Which Miss Manners Solves the Problem That Baffled Mr. Jefferson

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Which part?

Originally posted by Startreader
Do you have any mode of speech other than permanent sneer?

You're correct in thinking I have absolutely no interest in anything you have to say about anything because you are either in sneer, bully, or pretend prosecuting counsel mode.

This does not extent to Captain Strange. Just you and your Siamese twin.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I've said it before and will probably say it again, but FMF's style
is very inquisitorial and I can imagine annoying, it is easy to see
how those of a lower intellect would perceive it as "sneering".

It would probably be better for FMF not to assume anything
about the audience of his posts.

Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
No it's about you, i don't care what Robbie's or any ones religion is, there is a separate forum for that, which i stay well clear from.
why do you have to drag it in here?
You are sick and twisted, and a pathetic poster, mock and bait then play the victim when any one stands up to you and FMF.
Not heard you crying about your friend for a few pages, you probably made that up as well.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The statement is demonstrably false. He does not support our stance on removing people from the congregation, he does not support our stance on refusing whole blood, he has termed us a pernicious cult because of our stance on the practice of homosexuality, infact his posting history is one of habitually attacking people who want to worship as they see fit and I even provided the reason, because he is a religious bigot.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
His posting history is one of habitually criticising others for their beliefs making your assertion that he seeks to support the efforts of others to worship as they see fit demonstrably false infact he has stated that he wishes to vociferously oppose my own religious organisation which he has publicly stated is a pernicious cult specifically because ...[text shortened]... n their desire to worship as they see fit. - Divesgeester - a demonstrable lie plain and simple.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You will cite a single text where he 'supports me in my desire to worship as I see fit', as he has publicly stated.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
On the contrary he fully opposes our stance on blood, he fully opposes out practice of removing unrepentant wrongdoers, these are tenets of our worship.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
So you cannot provide a single iota where he fully supports us in our freedom to worship as we see fit, thankyou, why can you not provide it because its a lie, he does not support us in worshipping as we see fit. He is a religious bigot.