18 Jan 16
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesterdude the only people looking like fools at this moment in time are you and your boyfriend for lack of evidence, you have been caught by your own propaganda, its joyous. People can now see you for what you are nothing more than a pair of lying and insidious creeps that make up lies about people simply to cause them pain.
Why alert the topic here when you never did in the spirituality forum? Your little clutch of GF cronies should be able to see you for what you are.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120150
18 Jan 16
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe official report cited in the OP I linked to, among other things, accused your religious organisation of putting its own reputation above the interest of the hundreds of sexually abused child victims. You defended and defended and defended your organisation in the face of overwhelming evidence of gross criminality. That is essence of the issue.
Fine let the site administration decide whether or not i have as you have claimed, (without being able to reproduce a single piece of substantiating evidence), that I have and I quote, ' defended the cover up of people having sex with children'
Originally posted by divegeesterI have not in principle nor in any shape or form and I quote, 'defended the cover up of people having sex with children - FMF ' and you cannot produce a single reference where I have despite being asked five or six possibly more times, because it does not exist and your sinister and creepy boyfriend has been caught making assertions that he cannot substantiate.
The official report cited in the OP I linked to, among other things, accused your religious organisation of putting its own reputation above the interest of the hundreds of sexually abused child victims. You defended and defended and defended your organisation in the face of overwhelming evidence of gross criminality. That is essence of the issue.
If you like i will produce the statement where I state that those who have engaged in criminality should face justice, shall i do it now? shall I?
18 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe kind of cover ups you defended are carried out by the organisation you are a member of ~ and the perpetrators whose sex crimes you argued in favour of covering up are members of that organization. It's all in that thread I linked to.
Fine let the site administration decide whether or not i have as you have claimed, (without being able to reproduce a single piece of substantiating evidence), that I have and I quote, ' defended the cover up of people having sex with children'
18 Jan 16
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFsure it is and yet you seem unable to provide a single reference, why is that? Do you expect people to believe you simply because you say it is?
The kind of cover ups you defended are carried out by the organisation you are a member of ~ and the perpetrators whose sex crimes you argued in favour of covering up are members of that organization. It's all in that thread I linked to.
18 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf you have changed your stance since the thread in question and your current stance is that you do not support or endorse the covering up or withholding of information from law enforcement authorities of sexual abuse of children (committed by members of your organization) by your organisation in any circumstances then why not just say so now.
If you like i will produce the statement where I state that those who have engaged in criminality should face justice, shall i do it now? shall I?
18 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieRead the thread. There are pages and pages of you laying out your argument for keeping cases of child sex abuse confidential within your organization and not telling the authorities.
sure it is and yet you seem unable to provide a single reference, why is that?
18 Jan 16
Originally posted by FMFdude i don't believe your propaganda, why don't you understand, its meaningless drivel, we are not interested in what you think, we are interested in evidence and so far you have been able to produce nothing, why is that?
If you have changed your stance since the thread in question and your current stance is that you do not support or endorse the covering up or withholding of information from law enforcement authorities of sexual abuse of children (committed by members of your organization) by your organisation in any circumstances then why not just say so now.
18 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThread 162947. It's all there. have you been back to read it?
dude i don't believe your propaganda, why don't you understand, its meaningless drivel, we are not interested in what you think, we are interested in evidence and so far you have been able to produce nothing, why is that?
18 Jan 16
4 edits
Originally posted by FMFAgain that is not evidence, you have made a serious claim and repeating ad nauseum that it in the thread is not working for you dude, its just not very convincing. Do you think other people will be convinced by it? what kind of fools do you take them for?
Read the thread. There are pages and pages of you laying out your argument for keeping cases of child sex abuse confidential within your organization and not telling the authorities.
Here is your statement again in case you have forgotten it, you have stated that i have and i quote, 'defended the cover up of people having sex with children' these are your words are they not, i simply want to know where i have in your words, ''defended the cover up of people having sex with children'. surely you know and can provide a reference?
18 Jan 16
Originally posted by FMFyes and i can find not a single reference where i have and i quote your words, 'defended the cover up of people having sex with children' and seeing that you cannot provide any i am forced top conclude that either you made it up and are a vile liar or that it does not exists. You see sir the onus is on you to provide evidence for your claims, not me.
Thread 162947. It's all there. have you been back to read it?
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
18 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIn any case, this whole nonsense reads like a few people demonising Robbie and holding him responsible for the wrongdoing of other individuals over whom he has no control.
yes and i can find not a single reference where i have and i quote your words, 'defended the cover up of people having sex with children' and seeing that you cannot provide any i am forced top conclude that either you made it up and are a vile liar or that it does not exists. You see sir the onus is on you to provide evidence for your claims, not me.
It's embarrassing in its self-righteous stupidity.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120150
18 Jan 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe "reference" is the threads id, the "evidence" is your words in the threads. It's not a difficult concept.
again that is not evidence, you have made a serious claim and repeating ad nauseoum that it in the thread is not working for you dude, its just not very convincing. Do you think other people will be convinced by it? what kind of fools do you take them for?
Here is your statement again in case you have forgotten it, you have stated that i have a ...[text shortened]... d the cover up of people having sex with children'. surely you know and can provide a reference?
- Joined
- 27 May 12
- Moves
- 13549
18 Jan 16
Memo
To my friends, for personal reasons I've decided not to renew my subscription which expires on January 6, 2016. To my almost friends, this will be my final thread on this forum for the foreseeable future. To Russ and his Admin Staff, thank you for an enjoyable experience since July, 2007. Kind Regards, GB
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 120150
18 Jan 16
1 edit
Originally posted by StartreaderLast time you pitched in I asked you if you have read the report, have you? Have you read the threads?
In any case, this whole nonsense reads like a few people demonising Robbie and holding him responsible for the wrongdoing of other individuals over whom he has no control.
It's embarrassing in its self-righteous stupidity.