Originally posted by Grampy BobbyBad poll, Bobby.
All four options are "friendly" if the responses reflect a measure of accuracy and honesty.
Friends, even in cyberspace, don't practice deception and/or subterfuge with friends.
Considering your negative attitude toward word games, that option is certainly not
"friendly." Discord and fighting for any reason are far from "friendly."
What's left? Posters who entertain and agree with you.
Originally posted by divegeester"All four options are "friendly" if the responses reflect a measure of accuracy and honesty.
Your third option is based on whom?
Friends, even in cyberspace, don't practice deception and/or subterfuge with friends."
Of course, no one. The third option's provided as a 3-Sigma possibility for those rare few
individuals with the honesty and courage to require it in the context described above.
Originally posted by HandyAndyAs always, Andy, I respect your freedom to form and express an opinion.
Bad poll, Bobby.
Considering your negative attitude toward word games, that option is certainly not
"friendly." Discord and fighting for any reason are far from "friendly."
What's left? Posters who entertain and agree with you.
Edit: Would you care to comment on your primary reason for visiting this public forum?
Originally posted by HandyAndy"Considering your negative attitude toward word games, that option is certainly not
Bad poll, Bobby.
Considering your negative attitude toward word games, that option is certainly not
"friendly." Discord and fighting for any reason are far from "friendly."
What's left? Posters who entertain and agree with you.
"friendly." Discord and fighting for any reason are far from "friendly."
What's left? Posters who entertain and agree with you."
_____________________
Reason for including word games is because they've accounted for 10.9 posts per day of the total 30.4 per day during the thirty day period August 29 to September 27, 2013. "Discord and fighting for any reason are far from "friendly." Agree. Why include the option? Were you around here yesterday? If you were you'd realize the option is essential to the poll profile.
____________________________
General Forum Post Mix Comparison: August 29 to September 27, 2013 (Page One)
No Percentage Comparisons. Hard/Still Sad Numbers only:
"WAG": 24,266 Posts in Four Threads on RHP's General Forum:
(A-Z Word Association Game; Word Association Game 2; Word assoc. Z-A):
(Last letter of previous word - A to Z - Word as...;
sub total counted, even though the thread is now on page two.)
[24,592 = + 326 / 30 Days = +10.9 per day]<---@
"STG": 8,264 Posts in One Thread on the General Forum:
[8,303 = + 39 / 30 days = +1.3 per day]<---@
"General Conversation": 1,429 Posts in the twenty five (25) other page one
General Forum threads: [1,975 = + 546 / 30 days = + 18.2 per day]<---@
Total Posts: 33,959 Posts on RHP's General Forum, Page One.
[34,870 = + 911 / 30 days = + 30.4 per day ||| 1.3 posts per hour]<-----@
Note: This update indicates a return to the same posting volumes of two
months ago (as compared with the low point 22.9 total page one posts per day
one month ago. Sad, huh. Less than two posts each hour. Regards, Bob
("Why is this forum dying?" thread, updated Friday)
29 Sep 13
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyOne of the statistics that your analysis lacks is the average number of words per post during
"Considering your negative attitude toward word games, that option is certainly not
"friendly." Discord and fighting for any reason are far from "friendly."
What's left? Posters who entertain and agree with you."
_____________________
Reason for including word games is because they've accounted for [b]10.9 posts per day of the total 30.4 per d ...[text shortened]... Less than two posts each hour. Regards, Bob
("Why is this forum dying?" thread, updated Friday)
the time period August 29 to September 27, 2013. Could you provide this important number,
as well as a comparison with the same time period in 2012?
These important figures would put the dying-forum model into better perspective.
Originally posted by HandyAndyIf you feel strongly that these computations are essential to confirming or adjusting
One of the statistics that your analysis lacks is the average number of words per post during
the time period August 29 to September 27, 2013. Could you provide this important number,
as well as a comparison with the same time period in 2012?
These important figures would put the dying-forum model into better perspective.
the gradually declining trend, perhaps Ponderable could help you in this regard.
Note: Another successful "Wheelbarrow" type thread from you might help the cause.
Originally posted by HandyAndyIt's a simple poll. Decline is apparent. Time spent on the needless analysis you suggest would be far better spent contributing to this site centerpiece forum. When is the last time that you gave birth to a thread of your own?
But it's your hypothesis, Bobby, not mine. Are you afraid of a little work?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhen was the last time, Bobby.
It's a simple poll. Decline is apparent. Time spent on the needless analysis you suggest would be far better spent contributing to this site centerpiece forum. When is the last time that you gave birth to a thread of your own?
Do you call this nonsense giving birth?