Originally posted by Landisqueen170I love "Les Misérables"! My only regret is that I never saw it on the stage.
I am jotting a bunch of these down. lol Thanks 🙂
"Les Mis" is worth a few views if for no other reason than to see both Hugh Jackman's and Hathaway's performances. Cannot compare to theater but still pretty admirable 🙂
"Wolverine Sings!" lol...
- Joined
- 09 Feb 10
- Moves
- 48656
12 Aug 15
Originally posted by SuzianneI never have seen him in "Wolverine." I need to add that one to my list! He's a great actor no matter what the role, but he OWNS his role in "Les Mis." Gut-wrenching.
I love "Les Misérables"! My only regret is that I never saw it on the stage.
"Wolverine Sings!" lol...
12 Aug 15
Originally posted by Landisqueen170I found Les Mis dreadful -- unwatchably so. The singing was so poor (at least in the first 20 minutes that I watched), and it just had that air of luvvies taking themselves far too seriously, which from time-to-time is prone to happening. The book, though, is one of my all-time favourites.
I never have seen him in "Wolverine." I need to add that one to my list! He's a great actor no matter what the role, but he OWNS his role in "Les Mis." Gut-wrenching.
- Joined
- 09 Feb 10
- Moves
- 48656
12 Aug 15
Originally posted by NoEarthlyReasonThe singing was indeed "poor" by musical standards. But it was authentic and it needed to be as such. Jackman is not a singer. But I think that is what made the it so great. Crowe can't carry a tune either. lol But it was this realism that made their characters believable. Personally, I think Jackman put his heart and role into that role and it showed. Same for Hathaway. I don't see how you can call the movie "dreadful" but "suum cuique" as the saying goes 🙂
I found Les Mis dreadful -- unwatchably so. The singing was so poor (at least in the first 20 minutes that I watched), and it just had that air of luvvies taking themselves far too seriously, which from time-to-time is prone to happening. The book, though, is one of my all-time favourites.
Like many movies, it is not for everyone. My husband suffered through it as well. lol
The theater production exceeds the film. And of course, the book, as always, exceeds both.
13 Aug 15
Originally posted by Landisqueen170I totally agree. Well worth the time and far better than most dreck on TV these days.
The singing was indeed "poor" by musical standards. But it was authentic and it needed to be as such. Jackman is not a singer. But I think that is what made the it so great. Crowe can't carry a tune either. lol But it was this realism that made their characters believable. Personally, I think Jackman put his heart and role into that role and it showed ...[text shortened]... ol
The theater production exceeds the film. And of course, the book, as always, exceeds both.
- Joined
- 09 Feb 10
- Moves
- 48656
13 Aug 15
Originally posted by SuzianneYes ....a quality story for a change. I am not one to watch a musical but so glad I did....the "Les Mis" movie resonated with me days later. I still get goosebumps thinking of some of those performances!
I totally agree. Well worth the time and far better than most dreck on TV these days.
13 Aug 15
Originally posted by Landisqueen170I will not watch Les Mis, because I cannot see Wolverine dancing around and singing......in which he cannot sing, as you said. He is Wolverine for God's sake.
Yes ....a quality story for a change. I am not one to watch a musical but so glad I did....the "Les Mis" movie resonated with me days later. I still get goosebumps thinking of some of those performances!
Back me up here Suzianne, lol. 🙂
- Joined
- 09 Feb 10
- Moves
- 48656
13 Aug 15
Originally posted by chaney3Trust me...Jackman easily maintains his manliness in "Les Mis!" No doubt!!!!
I will not watch Les Mis, because I cannot see Wolverine dancing around and singing......in which he cannot sing, as you said. He is Wolverine for God's sake.
Back me up here Suzianne, lol. 🙂