09 Dec 07
Originally posted by Montgomery3RHP made a rule to have ONE name on the sites. You don't pay, you get 6 games. What's the sense in a limit of 6 games if you can have more than one name.
Since this site is a trinity what is wrong with having an account with each member of that trinity providing one does not play oneself in games of chess?
On top of that, there used to be users who would have several names, and any time they had an argument in the forums they would use their other names to agree with themselves in hopes of it making them look like they were actually right or at least someone else agreed with them.
Next, there were users who made several names, and would pretend to be different people. They would tell heart-breaking stories they had made up getting other users to share their personal experiences... and it turned out to be one bored teen being an idiot rather than a real person with actual problems.
Also, if you can make more than one name... where does it stop? There are a number of good reasons for one name per person, these are just a few.
P-
09 Dec 07
Originally posted by PhlabibitThank you.
RHP made a rule to have ONE name on the sites. You don't pay, you get 6 games. What's the sense in a limit of 6 games if you can have more than one name.
On top of that, there used to be users who would have several names, and any time they had an argument in the forums they would use their other names to agree with themselves in hopes of it making th ...[text shortened]... stop? There are a number of good reasons for one name per person, these are just a few.
P-
09 Dec 07
Originally posted by PhlabibitA cunning plan of SPECTRE-esque proportions if ever I heard one!
On top of that, there used to be users who would have several names, and any time they had an argument in the forums they would use their other names to agree with themselves in hopes of it making them look like they were actually right or at least someone else agreed with them.
10 Dec 07
Originally posted by PhlabibitThey should have just put together a clan of morons to agree with them like the carp.
On top of that, there used to be users who would have several names, and any time they had an argument in the forums they would use their other names to agree with themselves in hopes of it making them look like they were actually right or at least someone else agreed with them.
P-
10 Dec 07
Originally posted by Red NightSo when people in your clan agree with you it's because they're morons and not because like-minded people are more likely to be in the same clans? I should have paid more attention in sociology.
They should have just put together a clan of morons to agree with them like the carp.