Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveNo country in there right mind would invade the US. We are the best armed civillian population in the world. It would take an Army of 50,000,000 to overun us. Those numbers are logitically impossible to feed and transport by any country in the world.
Typical Yanks!
One day they'll realise guns are a bad idea for citizens. π
So Thereπ
Originally posted by duecerSweden does it right. Everyone has a gun, but they have to do national service at 18, and get to keep the gun they're trained with....that's the way to do it (not much gansta rap from Sweden)
No country in there right mind would invade the US. We are the best armed civillian population in the world. It would take an Army of 50,000,000 to overun us. Those numbers are logitically impossible to feed and transport by any country in the world.
So Thereπ
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3Wrong. Read the militia act of 1795 and 1961. The people are the militia. Nowhere in the Constitution does it give the gov't the right to have a standing army. So, amend the Constitution and repeal the 2nd amendment . I'll still be a criminal with a gun, for self defense only, in my home.
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
- Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The problem here, is that this clearly only gives the right to keep and bear arms if a "well regulated militia" is necessary. Since there is a proper ...[text shortened]... a militia of local citizens,) put in place after this was ratified, it no longer holds true.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundCitizen on citizen? You mean Criminal citizens on law abiding citizens don't you? People get killed in there own cars, using tools, slip and fall accidents. Police kill people ( criminals), people commit suicide, etc. Read the lastest FBI reports. What about all the illegals coming into the country with guns, gangs and whatever. And you want me to disarm? All i want is a gun for protection in my home, using proper safety procedures and following the laws concerning lethal use thereof.
Isn't it true that America has the most cases of Citizen on citizen gun attacks in the world ?
I'm not the brains of britain, but the numbers concearning people being killed with their own weapons are also kinda freaky (technical term). π
Originally posted by smw6869I don't give a flying crap what you do buddy, i just through a fact into the mix. If you're in the US, you've more chance of being shot by another citizen than in any other country in the world. Deal with it as you wish, your funeral.
Citizen on citizen? You mean Criminal citizens on law abiding citizens don't you? People get killed in there own cars, using tools, slip and fall accidents. Police kill people ( criminals), people commit suicide, etc. Read the lastest FBI reports. What about all the illegals coming into the country with guns, gangs and whatever. And you want me to disarm? Al ...[text shortened]... n my home, using proper safety procedures and following the laws concerning lethal use thereof.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundDon't you Scotts carry guns under your kilts? I'd rather be shot than listen to bagpipes.
I don't give a flying crap what you do buddy, i just through a fact into the mix. If you're in the US, you've more chance of being shot by another citizen than in any other country in the world. Deal with it as you wish, your funeral.
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveCould you please state the law that that says we have the right to blow our neighbors away if they spit on their gardens.
They have the right to bear arms FFS.
[what a joke that is] π
And the right to blow there neighbours away if they spit in their gardens. lol.
I've always wondered why non-Americans are worried about us killing ourselves. You must love us sooo much, and i thought you hated us Yanks all this time.
Hmmmmmmmm!
Put your cow bells on and get back into your barn.
Concern youself with your Special Air Service killing innocents in Iraq.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundI understand what you're saying. I'm just giving my point of view. I told you i'm giving up my gun. Now there won't be anymore citizens killing each other. Thanks for sharing your logic. Ted Kennedy has killed more people with his car than i have with my gun.
I don't give a flying crap what you do buddy, i just through a fact into the mix. If you're in the US, you've more chance of being shot by another citizen than in any other country in the world. Deal with it as you wish, your funeral.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundMilitary Guns were banned in England after WWI when the soldiers were coming home with their guns( that was common in those days). The British gov't sucked and the were afraid the armed soldiers would overthrow the gov't. That's why the started to ban guns. And that's why all gov't are afraid of their citizens having guns. You've been conned all these years thinking it was for your safty when it was to protect the gov't from armed citizens. Same with the U.S. gov't. I hope they sent that gun to jail for life after it killed all those kids. Good thing he didn't use a knife, how would you eat your turnips.
Hand guns were banned in our country after Dunblane, when a member of a gun club went into a primary school and shot a class full of pre teens.
Ya fat pie eatin yank π
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3Great. So far that makes two of us who've figured this out. Only 301,139,945 left! Oh, wait. If you're not a yank then 301,139,946.
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
- Second Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The problem here, is that this clearly only gives the right to keep and bear arms if a "well regulated militia" is necessary. Since there is a proper ...[text shortened]... a militia of local citizens,) put in place after this was ratified, it no longer holds true.
You don't need a kalashnikov [or whatever] to protect yourself in your own home - as mentioned already a baseball bat will suffice.
Contrary to popular [American] belief guns don't make you more macho. π
We don't actually care too much if you want to shoot each other; it just seems rather sad..or something.
Originally posted by smw6869Where did the term Yank come from?
Military Guns were banned in England after WWI when the soldiers were coming home with their guns( that was common in those days). The British gov't sucked and the were afraid the armed soldiers would overthrow the gov't. That's why the started to ban guns. And that's why all gov't are afraid of their citizens having guns. You've been conned all these years ...[text shortened]... illed all those kids. Good thing he didn't use a knife, how would you eat your turnips.
I realize it's a derogatory term, but we take pride in being called that.
Therefore, please keep saying it.
Thank you.
Originally posted by smw6869I don't think it's used in a derogatory way - certainly not when Brits use the word - it simply means "American" to us.
Where did the term Yank come from?
I realize it's a derogatory term, but we take pride in being called that.
Therefore, please keep saying it.
Thank you.
You're welcome. π
edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee#Origins_of_the_word
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveThe criminals seem to think they need Kalishnikovs to kill ME. It's not a macho thing. I think a thug with a gun can shoot a bullet at me faster than i can hit him with a bat. I can't believe the naivete of you people. I don't think you feel sorry for us. It's just your hate for Americans. Then again, i'm appalled at what goes on in this country sometimes, also.
You don't need a kalashnikov [or whatever] to protect yourself in your own home - as mentioned already a baseball bat will suffice.
Contrary to popular [American] belief guns don't make you more macho. π
We don't actually care too much if you want to shoot each other; it just seems rather sad..or something.