Pastor Anderson Exposed

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
He just came up for pre-trial hearing, his family blog mentions it. He wanted to get off scot-free if he promised to stop being a jerk, the DA laughed at him and said theywere going to trial.

What did the cops get for promising not to be jerks again?

And why is the pastor even being taken to court?


I smell a rat. 😕

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove


And why is the pastor even being taken to court?


I smell a rat. 😕

The official charge was "blocking a public highway and failing to obey an officers orders directing traffic." . He plugged up the lane for AN HOUR before the police arrived, refusing to pull over to the secondary inspection point, then refused to follow orders when placed under arrest.

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
The official charge was "blocking a public highway and failing to obey an officers orders directing traffic." . He plugged up the lane for AN HOUR before the police arrived, refusing to pull over to the secondary inspection point, then refused to follow orders when placed under arrest.

Aha I see - the old ploy: "charge him with something to justify our moronic actions" 🙄

We get that a lot in the UK too.

Originally posted by smw6869
I surmise that the good Rev placed some ground hamburger in his vehicle to alert the dog, then he played the cops insisting he had no Drugs just to get a law suit.

GRANNY.

Where's the evidence to this theory?

FAIL~!

Originally posted by CCNoob
He apparently wants the two camcorders back that were confiscated. Why would someone ordinary be cruising with 2 camcorders recording his actions unless he planned it all along? I'm surprised he didn't have a tv crew lurking close by as he is an attention seeker.

And what is wrong with that? It's within the law you know. I am not sure that confiscating (stealing) his property after making an illegal assault on his person is legal though.

Originally posted by cashthetrash
Where's the evidence to this theory?

[b]FAIL~![/b]

Dat's what my crystal balls revealed to me.

GRANNY.

Originally posted by CCNoob
He apparently wants the two camcorders back that were confiscated. Why would someone ordinary be cruising with 2 camcorders recording his actions unless he planned it all along? I'm surprised he didn't have a tv crew lurking close by as he is an attention seeker.

I'm sure the guy planned it.

Originally posted by smw6869
Dat's what my crystal balls revealed to me.

GRANNY.

It could happen I suppose, but I am wondering if the dogs truly alerted his car in the first place. The Paster says no. and the border patrol and the DPS had the opportunity to bring the dog back but refused. Why because ther was no hamburger. I say instead, that is pretty strong evidence that the Border patrol was trying to falsify the probable cause by fictitiously claiming the the dog alerted the car. Dogs are not always that reliable. And today the Border Patrol can actually Xray the vehicles. Use infrared heat sensing technology and has censers that is way beyond the abilities of a dog to sniff out drugs. But you can claim a dog to reacted when in fact they didn't. Bahhh, the guy was innocent and just being harassed.

My crystal balls are much more revealing than yours by the way.

Originally posted by cashthetrash
It could happen I suppose, but I am wondering if the dogs truly alerted his car in the first place. The Paster says no. and the border patrol and the DPS had the opportunity to bring the dog back but refused. Why because ther was no hamburger. I say instead, that is pretty strong evidence that the Border patrol was trying to falsify the probable cause b ...[text shortened]... nt and just being harassed.

My crystal balls are much more revealing than yours by the way.

Isn't it odd that thousands of people go through this station everyday with no problem, but Anderson can't make it through without it being a disaster?

Nobody else. Just him.

Originally posted by cashthetrash
It could happen I suppose, but I am wondering if the dogs truly alerted his car in the first place. The Paster says no. and the border patrol and the DPS had the opportunity to bring the dog back but refused. Why because ther was no hamburger. I say instead, that is pretty strong evidence that the Border patrol was trying to falsify the probable cause b ...[text shortened]... nt and just being harassed.

My crystal balls are much more revealing than yours by the way.

Why do you think they chose the Rev to screw with? Hamburger my friend.....Hamburger.

GRANNY.

Originally posted by smw6869
Why do you think they chose the Rev to screw with? Hamburger my friend.....Hamburger.

GRANNY.

Was there any evidence of the hamburger?

Or did the boarder guards eat the evidence?

OR was there simply no hamburger to begin with?

Where is the beef?

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Was there any evidence of the hamburger?

Or did the boarder guards eat the evidence?

OR was there simply no hamburger to begin with?

Where is the beef?

The hamburger was not noticed by the officers and was removed by the Rev at a later date. This is a common trick used by drug dealers to get the dogs to identify the hamburger and cause the officers to let the car go. The Rev used this tactic to play funzie-do with the police and screw everyone behind him. The Rev was looking for a big money pay day.

GRANNY.

Originally posted by smw6869
The hamburger was not noticed by the officers and was removed by the Rev at a later date. This is a common trick used by drug dealers to get the dogs to identify the hamburger and cause the officers to let the car go. The Rev used this tactic to play funzie-do with the police and screw everyone behind him. The Rev was looking for a big money pay day.

GRANNY.

There is no proof that there ever was any hamburger!

It all hypothetical, without the evidence.

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove

I smell a rat. 😕

time to change your underwear?😛

speaking of which, maybe that's what the dogs were getting so excited about. the pastor deliberately recycled his underpants to get the dogs worked up. clever plan, no incriminating hamburger mince to dispose of, all his has to do is throw his undies in the washing machine and the evidence is all gone. diabolically clever.

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
Isn't it odd that thousands of people go through this station everyday with no problem, but Anderson can't make it through without it being a disaster?

Nobody else. Just him.

What makes you think it is just him? When one person gives away their rights it makes it harder for everyone else. Because they (government) will keep moving the goal posts and the young guys will just think it is supposed to be that way. Bahhhhh. Sissys Robot heads.