Peace In the General Forum

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Completely untrue.

I remember you saying it!

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Completely untrue. We continued in a civil manner for a long while after the Chamber was created.

Then why could you not bring yourself to PM me and tell me to use a different pseudonym?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
No.

Why not?

You threatened it quite seriously several times on one thread alone.

@divegeester said
Well it kind of is really isn’t it.

1. Rusty-free zone - A place where we don't talk about Rusty.
2. Anti-Rusty club - A place where we sit around saying bad things about Rusty.

How are they the same?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
1. Rusty-free zone - A place where we don't talk about Rusty.
2. Anti-Rusty club - A place where we sit around saying bad things about Rusty.

How are they the same?

Dear me, your casual intellectual dishonesty knows no bounds does it.

The reason you started the club was to strip the general forum of the key contributors and to therefore ostracise VR from conversations.

It was an anti VR strategy. Malicious and contrived.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I suspect a genuine friend would have asked in advance to change my name on a radio broadcast, especially at a time when things were not good between us. Why didn't you do that?

You have never answered that question.

Bump for FMF.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
1. Rusty-free zone - A place where we don't talk about Rusty.
2. Anti-Rusty club - A place where we sit around saying bad things about Rusty.

How are they the same?

1. Rusty-free zone and 2. Anti-Rusty club : a place where posters from the General Forum are syphoned off so that Very Rusty is excluded and ignored regardless of the consequences for the General Forum.

@divegeester said
I remember you saying it!

Well, that's compelling evidence. Case closed.

@fmf said
Then why could you not bring yourself to PM me and tell me to use a different pseudonym?

Why didn't you PM me to seek permission?! (Or explain what you were intending to do).

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Well, that's compelling evidence. Case closed.

Why didn’t you carry out your multiple malicious threats to report me for a breach of the data protection act?

@divegeester said
Why didn’t you carry out your multiple malicious threats to report me for a breach of the data protection act?

Do you know the difference between a threat and a warning?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I suspect a genuine friend would have asked in advance to change my name on a radio broadcast, especially at a time when things were not good between us. Why didn't you do that?

I thought what I did was fine and humorous too. The show is made by a bunch of friends, after all. If I had wanted to be "malicious" ~ and I didn't ~ then there wouldn't have been any of your onions in the show, let alone two of them. I thought a spoonerized name for you and a spoonerized name for Phil was fine. You should have PM'd me.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Well, that's compelling evidence. Case closed.

But it’s fine, you can just call me a liar if you like.

@divegeester said
Dear me, your casual intellectual dishonesty knows no bounds does it.

The reason you started the club was to strip the general forum of the key contributors and to therefore ostracise VR from conversations.

It was an anti VR strategy. Malicious and contrived.

Rusty now has full access to previous threads and posts (nothing has been deleted) and is aware of the reality of the situation and not the spin you have always tried to put on it.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Do you know the difference between a threat and a warning?

Why did you make your complaint to the radio station using a local government e-mail account? And why did you pretend it was CONFIDENTIAL when you did not send it to any named person but instead sent it to an account accessed by at least 40 different people at the radio station? What breach of the Data Protection Act were you referring to?