- Joined
- 03 Sep 03
- Moves
- 87628
11 Oct 05
Originally posted by kirksey957Hrmm...
It truly would be the irony of ironies if a moderator got banned. Let's assume he was not warned. I imagine that it would indeed be a glorious day for you.
I ASSumed that he would enjoy it much more if Phlab WAS WARNED.
Then he could complain about "favoritism". If Phlab wasn't warned, then those that have been banned without warning in the past have nothing to protest.
--tmetzler
11 Oct 05
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesYou know , as a reverend, I believe that one should espouse repentence before they are allowed to come back. I remember you did this in a very public way in the forums and you asked people to hold you accountable for any further sins that might arise. Perhaps we need to think about this as a policy. I commend you for leading by example.
Reverend, the joy is nearly overwhelming.
11 Oct 05
Originally posted by AikoSo was it simply the act of posting in a closed thread , or was it what they were posting that got them banned ?
I got informed about the banning of these very naughty people: Freddie, Nordlys, rhb, Coconut, Phlabibit, Rheymans, Angie88, and possibly Shavixmir?
Angie88 and rhb send their regards, by the way.
11 Oct 05
Originally posted by RookRAKI can kind of understand it . Hacking around on the site can't be allowed . What if they were hacking pm's , game pages , or worse yet people's moves ? I think zero tollerance for any kind of hacking is probably the best policy .
From what I hear, it's simply that they *were* posting; i.e. had discovered a hole in RHP logic.
I think this is totally lame.