07 Aug 11
Originally posted by trev33I think in English law if someone breaks into your house and you kill them, you get ****ed by the law.
about 7 billion people on earth, around 20 thousand polar bears.
i really don't care about the people killed, they knew the risks when entering the area, it's not the bears fault man thinks he can do whatever he wants.
look at it this way, you hear a noise in your home and go and see whats going on, you discover that you're being robbed. you get angry ...[text shortened]... nds up killing you 'in self defense'. what should happen to the person who just killed you?
07 Aug 11
Originally posted by trev33WHERE DID YOU READ ABOUT THE BOY BREAKING INTO THE BEAR'S TENT? PLEASE SHOW ME.
in my scenario the person breaking it in is killing the owner of the house 'in self defense', what happens then?
It looks as if you must have smoked something to come up with all these ludicrous suggestions.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 19047
07 Aug 11
1 edit
Originally posted by kopatovthey were entering the bears tent when they needed to carry a gun 'for safety'.
WHERE DID YOU READ ABOUT THE BOY BREAKING INTO THE BEAR'S TENT? PLEASE SHOW ME.
It looks as if you must have smoked something to come up with all these ludicrous suggestions.
so are you going to answer the question, what should happen to the person who kills you n my scenario?
Originally posted by trev33Just one thing though Trev, animals take second place throughout society. Every day huge numbers of animals are slaughtered for food and other parts of their bodies, just so that we can lead cushty lives. A lot of the deaths are completely pointless. Vivisecion for instance? Why get hung up on this one particular incident? These people were fighting for their lives. I think they had every right to defend themselves. Who said the polar bear owns the habitat it was linving in? Why did it have the right to kill people for walking by? It didn't. It was just instinct, just as people have instincts to go and explore, have adventures and see the beauty in the world. The whole thing was a tragic set of circumstances and events. I don't think they set out to have a fight with a bear. Why does anyone or anything have to be held accountable, when there has already been enough damage caused?
in my scenario the person breaking it in is killing the owner of the house 'in self defense', what happens then?
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 19047
07 Aug 11
Originally posted by jimslyp69are you trying to say the bear was slipping on its mortgage payments? no wonder the european economy is failing apart 😵
Just one thing though Trev, animals take second place throughout society. Every day huge numbers of animals are slaughtered for food and other parts of their bodies, just so that we can lead cushty lives. A lot of the deaths are completely pointless. Vivisecion for instance? Why get hung up on this one particular incident? These people were fighting for th ...[text shortened]... one or anything have to be held accountable, when there has already been enough damage caused?
people kill animals for food, animals kill animals for food... animals can kill humans for food. i don't know why the bear felt the need to attack and kill, maybe it was hungry...
"In 1973, Canada, the United States, Denmark, Norway and the former U.S.S.R. signed the International Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears and their Habitat."
http://www.worldwildlife.org/species/finder/polarbear/polarbear.html
this is why someone needs to be accountable for the bears death... it's a protected species. did the students need to go exploring in the bears habitat
just as people have instincts to go and explore, have adventures and see the beauty in the world.
those people are mad 😵
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 19047
08 Aug 11
Originally posted by ChessPraxishttp://www.lolpig.com/angry-coca-cola-polar-bears/
This thread is brought to you by the Coca-Cola© company and your local Coca-Cola© bottlers.
note - this link contain offensive language that some forum moderators might not find appropriate.
08 Aug 11
Originally posted by trev33No trev, if an intruder was in your house and killed you for attacking him, it would not
about 7 billion people on earth, around 20 thousand polar bears.
i really don't care about the people killed, they knew the risks when entering the area, it's not the bears fault man thinks he can do whatever he wants.
look at it this way, you hear a noise in your home and go and see whats going on, you discover that you're being robbed. you get angry ...[text shortened]... nds up killing you 'in self defense'. what should happen to the person who just killed you?
be self defense. He would be charged for B&E as well as murder or at least manslaughter.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 19047
08 Aug 11
Originally posted by shortcircuithence why the person who murdered the polar bear should be brought to justice.
No trev, if an intruder was in your house and killed you for attacking him, it would not
be self defense. He would be charged for B&E as well as murder or at least manslaughter.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 19047
08 Aug 11
Originally posted by shortcircuitthe polar bear are a protected species, even in backwards alaska. the bear wins, an intentional day of mourning is announced and the person who killed the bear is fried and used as panda food.
No, polar bears are not treated with equal rights in our court system.
In our system, he gets executed.