Originally posted by Red NightI call a spade a spade.
You tarnished the title of moderator by berating a user who questioned the correctness of a series of posts you made.
You insulted him, called him names, and egged him on.
What do you think you deserve for your actions?
The guy apparently wouldn't know a racist post if it kicked him in the head.
He continued calling me a racist, I called him an idiot - which is how he was acting.
I don't think I 'insulted him, called him names, and egged him on' - I think I called him an idiot once or twice after he repeatedly called me racist.
That's not name-calling, that's stating the facts.
Originally posted by CrowleyWhat's it like in your world where you are always right?
I call a spade a spade.
The guy apparently wouldn't know a racist post if it kicked him in the head.
He continued calling me a racist, I called him an idiot - which is how he was acting.
I don't think I 'insulted him, called him names, and egged him on' - I think I called him an idiot once or twice after he repeatedly called me racist.
That's not name-calling, that's stating the facts.
1 edit
I seem to remember a thread about a year ago where Crowley (amongst others) illustrated why saffa actually held racist views in regards to the apartheid period, through inaction. Can anyone find this thread? Where's that long-haired leprechaun Ragnobookmark when you need him?
Originally posted by CrowleyThread 55832
I call a spade a spade.
The guy apparently wouldn't know a racist post if it kicked him in the head.
He continued calling me a racist, I called him an idiot - which is how he was acting.
I don't think I 'insulted him, called him names, and egged him on' - I think I called him an idiot once or twice after he repeatedly called me racist.
That's not name-calling, that's stating the facts.
'Calling another poster an "idiot" will leave a post subject to immediate removal.'
Pwned!
Originally posted by NordlysAah, Noodles, ever diligent.
Thread 55832
'Calling another poster an "idiot" will leave a post subject to immediate removal.'
Pwned!
'Subject to removal', means somebody had to alert it. No-one did.
Can you find me a word that better describes a person who apparently does not understand the definition of a phrase, but keeps on using the phrase in question to describe the actions of another person, against the advice of one or more other people?
I can only think of idiot.
Originally posted by Nordlyslol
Thread 55832
'Calling another poster an "idiot" will leave a post subject to immediate removal.'
Pwned!
Wonder how often that is enforced and why a mod, who should know better, thinks its OK to do so in the first place.
😛