Originally posted by Raven69I think it is very kind, sweet, and innocent of you, how you always over estimate folks. π
Fortunately, no one here is stupid enough to believe the pic Rag has is actually him...π
π[/b]
EDIT: I am sure Rags will appreciate you defending him for putting a picture in his profile of a person who is not him!
Originally posted by ale1552christ on a bike!
Just curious. Why is it that people never take the name of a Brahman god, the Muslim god, or any other god in vain...only the names sacred to the Christian.....just wondering.
the believe concept of 'not taking the lord's name in vain' is a judeo-christian concept. hence it's usually an issue in christian, islamic and judaic cultures. the rest of us simply don't care.
I suppose the original version might be from sumerians or babylonians, like most of the judeo-christian mythology, but I don't really know. that's pretty much what usually turns out when you start digging for origins of biblical fragments. the flood, paradise, 'demons', resurrection etc... it's all been simply recycled throughout the times.
Originally posted by wormwoodThat's Allahtastic π
christ on a bike!
the believe concept of 'not taking the lord's name in vain' is a judeo-christian concept. hence it's usually an issue in christian, islamic and judaic cultures. the rest of us simply don't care.
I suppose the original version might be from sumerians or babylonians, like most of the judeo-christian mythology, but I don't really know ...[text shortened]... ise, 'demons', resurrection etc... it's all been simply recycled throughout the times.