19 Mar 11
Nope. I simply refuse to play non-sub parasitical patzers at any level. Besides, what I've seen of your ability to play accurately against any of the Sicilian lines, including the Najdorf, leaves a lot to be desired.
The Sozin is so last month now- even given it was Fischers little pet, it's easily countered with equal chances for black.
So, again, back to the horsey practice for you, it seems.
skeets
20 Mar 11
4 edits
Originally posted by skeeterplay accurately? my dear sketty weety, i am a chess artist, not an autobot, what that means to an uninitiated automaton* like you is, I experiment, go through stages of transition, try to find solutions to my vision, thus it is not in the same sense a skill, as in say, flying an aircraft, where a margin of error is not permissible, but where error is inevitable and to be welcomed. As for your comments about the Sozin, the same could be said of the mainline Bg5 or the English attack, or any other system one may wish to employ. I do believe some of your earlier games also show a gross margin of error or were you always 2300+, now if you dont mind, I have some knight manoeuvres to practice, that is the piece with the horses head skeety, not the one with the smiley faces on top. Anyhow i must thank you for taking the time and for at least being civil, it was truly refreshing, till we meet again skeety weety, pistols at dawn, when you will be mine!
Nope. I simply refuse to play non-sub parasitical patzers at any level. Besides, what I've seen of your ability to play accurately against [b]any of the Sicilian lines, including the Najdorf, leaves a lot to be desired.
The Sozin is so last month now- even given it was Fischers little pet, it's easily countered with equal chances for black.
So, again, back to the horsey practice for you, it seems.
skeets[/b]
kind regards robbie.
* not an accusation of cheating skeety, please dont think that, but of a methodical and systematic approach, as opposed to a free and experimental one.
20 Mar 11
You know, I would have given you a couple of boards, even suffered your Sozin, but, given your obvious contempt for my chess prowess and position, your continued sly cryptic cheating accusations and last, but by no means least, your disrespect and condescending obfuscation of my site nick - when 'skeets' or 'skeeter' would suffice - I considered you to be of low character and therefore not worthy of any match that I may have offered.
I will never play a game of chess with you in this life or the next, ever.
....and that's all I have to say about that and you, robbie carrobie.
skeeter
20 Mar 11
Originally posted by skeeterLol, that statement is richer than Very Rusty.
You know, I would have given you a couple of boards, even suffered your Sozin, but, given your obvious contempt for my chess prowess and position, your continued sly cryptic cheating accusations and last, but by no means least, your disrespect and condescending obfuscation of my site nick - when 'skeets' or 'skeeter' would suffice - I considered you to be of ...[text shortened]... b][/i].
....and that's all I have to say about that and you, robbie carrobie.
skeeter
20 Mar 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieCan your principles not extend to becoming left the site for good non sub scum rather than just remaining as non sub scum!
i rescinded the subscription there and then and while i have bought subscriptions for other persons, i will not do so for myself on principle.
20 Mar 11
2 edits
Originally posted by adramforallI wondered when skeetys flunkies would show up to defend her, ahem . . . honour.
Can your principles not extend to becoming left the site for good non sub scum rather than just remaining as non sub scum!
Were you not recently subject to the forced removal of certain avatars which sought to drive a paying user from the site with a sustained campaign of intimidation, and here you are, dumber than ever, harbouring similar delusions that you actually have some influence on who may or may not use the site.
I refuse to believe you are Scottish, there must be a Sassenach genetic link, maybe one of your ancestors got washed up on the firth of Clyde from a trading skooner coming out of Bristol or something, how else are we to account for your lamebo disposition?
20 Mar 11
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThere's no point jumping from one flaming wagon onto another robbie; that thread went down in flames just as this one is!
I wondered when skeetys flunkies would show up to defend her, ahem . . . honour.
Were you not recently subject to the forced removal of certain avatars which sought to drive a paying user from the site with a sustained campaign of intimidation, and here you are, dumber than ever, harbouring similar delusions that you actually have some influence ...[text shortened]... oner coming out of Bristol or something, how else are we to account for your lamebo disposition?
The user you are referring to moved 12 hours ago and I'm sure they don't need your support in a fight anyway. Nevertheless their decision to not post for a while is a blessed relief to the rest of us.
20 Mar 11
2 edits
Originally posted by divegeestermore banality, take it somewhere else or post something with actual content, for goodness sake. Nah only kidding my friend, I want to hear what users minions have to say. . .
There's no point jumping from one flaming wagon onto another robbie; that thread went down in flames just as this one is!
The user you are refering to moved 12 hours ago and I'm sure they don't need your support in a fight anyway. Nevertheless their decision to not post for a while is a blessed relief to the rest of us.
Actually i quite like skeety, despite her rough edges, you know where you stand, but I think she became incensed with a misunderstanding that i was covertly accusing her of cheating, which i took pains to avoid, even providing an explanation, but her cynicism and perhaps past experience would not let her accept this and she cut me off. Its ok, but it would have been nice to play her.
20 Mar 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBy that weird logic you must be VR's flunky?
I wondered when skeetys flunkies would show up to defend her, ahem . . . honour.
Were you not recently subject to the forced removal of certain avatars which sought to drive a paying user from the site with a sustained campaign of intimidation, and here you are, dumber than ever, harbouring similar delusions that you actually have some influence ...[text shortened]... oner coming out of Bristol or something, how else are we to account for your lamebo disposition?
I am 100% Scottish - can't say that about your family now, can we?
20 Mar 11
Originally posted by divegeesterplease see the edited text geester dude, when i say driven, it is with the understanding of an attempted effort. He certainly has been driven from the forums, and who can blame him.
So when you state the user who was [b]"driven from this site" you are not referring to VR who is still here playing chess then?[/b]