Should I have the 2nd jab?

The post that was quoted here has been removed

No, I never once entertained the idea of "bearing false witness". You are mistaken.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Saying I believed drewnogal's description of the pornographic image ~ an image that was one of the reasons the pornographer had his account suspended ~ has got nothing to do with anyone "bearing false witness".

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I am not lying, "blatantly", "pathologically", "obviously", "persistently" or otherwise.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

If you have any examples you'd like to cite from my "record of posts", bring it on. Stop merely repeating the accusation; convict me once and for all with some examples of pathological lies.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Nope. I wasn't "ready" to do any such thing.

@fmf said
I am not lying, "blatantly", "pathologically", "obviously", "persistently" or otherwise.

There have been occasions where you have twisted the truth and presented it as something entirely different. I consider that lying.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Cite a few examples. Be done with it. Enough with your toxic gossip. Put some examples where your mouth is.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
There have been occasions where you have twisted the truth and presented it as something entirely different. I consider that lying.

Not so. You and I may disagree about how we see your behaviour and how we see my behaviour - or remember them differently - around the time you nearly had our radio programmes cancelled, but I never lied about how I saw it.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

No there wasn't. I "argued" no such thing.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

You are mistaken. I said that I believed drewnogal's description of the image - the same image that the moderators found to warrant the suspension of the pornographer's account.