21 Jun 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis all happened on this thread, robbie, and the "particular point in time" was on page 7 which was only a couple of days ago. I asked him several times if he wanted to retract it.
You seem to be unaware that what one persons says at a particular point in time does not necessarily mean that they hold that perspective at every other time too.
21 Jun 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI was referring to something josephw said during this discussion a few thread pages ago. How is that "dragging something up from the past"? It's part of the current discussion. Isn't this 'retrospectively trolling' thing you come out with one of your comedy routines? Well at least it indicates you've had a look at page 7 and you can see josephw needs you to run a pass interference play. 😉
...your silly and quite useless attempt to retrospectively troll by dragging something up from the past, in a particular context and to attempt to utilise it at some other point ...
Originally posted by FMFOh FMF what does it matter? Why are you so determined to call people to account for their words? why cant you accept that everyone has a unique perspective?
This all happened on this thread, robbie, and the "particular point in time" was on page 7 which was only a couple of days ago. I asked him several times if he wanted to retract it.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOh look, you've posted some of your catchphrases again. 😛
I suspect that this tin star badge that you wear as forum sheriff as you drag people to account for what they have said, or allegedly said is simply another manifestation of your self righteousness for it becomes apparent that the standards they are being held accountable to are yours. When one asks who appointed you judge it also becomes evident th ...[text shortened]... You are a self certified, self appointed, self righteous judge. Isn't that pattern interesting?
