02 May 14
1 edit
Originally posted by cashthetrashthose questionning the projection are not factoring in the flux in postings, which naturally occur with the acceleration as arbitrary whimsical targets are approached. For example, one of those humongous national lotteries starts to build a giant jackpot and all of a sudden a bizillion people go out and buy a lot of tickets. Another example is when a galactic body drifts close to a black hole. it's all physics.
Why? War is war looser. "bowmann".
Just kidding.
As to the algorithm that was used in the calculation, please contact Google. They are very sharing.
02 May 14
Originally posted by coquetteYou're trying to tell us something, aren't you?
those questionning the projection are not factoring in the flux in postings, which naturally occur with the acceleration as arbitrary whimsical targets are approached. For example, one of those humongous national lotteries starts to build a giant jackpot and all of a sudden a bizillion people go out and buy a lot of tickets. Another example is when a galact ...[text shortened]... to the algorithm that was used in the calculation, please contact Google. They are very sharing.
02 May 14
Originally posted by coquettehi, coquette. your calculation represents a very fine piece of work. when you have a spare second, would you
I did the precise calculation. Post 10,000 will occur at 11:43:22:015 on August 18, 2014. The only variance might be a jump from 9,863 to 10,426 over a brief few minutes as multiple members attempt to hit the exact 10,000th post. Thus, the error range must be stated as a 97% confidence interval of +/- 6:23:045 minutes. The calculation is based on the rates ...[text shortened]... ces are, however, predictable and easily factored in.
No animals were harmed in posting this.
please determine precisely when this thread will reach its stated objective? Thread 158642 Thanks.
02 May 14
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhat do you want to bet it will take longer than a second to make that calculation. Not that I think she is stupid. But as a former athletic personnel member I like to keep the old stop watch handy in case I discover a gifted sprinter.
hi, coquette. your calculation represents a very fine piece of work. when you have a spare second, would you
please determine precisely when this thread will reach its stated objective? Thread 158642 Thanks.
02 May 14
1 edit
Originally posted by cashthetrashMore than a figurative "second" but less than half an hour would be my bet; got any spare cash? lol
What do you want to bet it will take longer than a second to make that calculation. Not that I think she is stupid. But as a former athletic personnel member I like to keep the old stop watch handy in case I discover a gifted sprinter.
