Originally posted by royalchickenI accept your donation with gratitude and in turn donate my net -11 points back to you as a token of my appreciation for your humorous arguments. π
Sorry Colin. PAG is not that much like Mao π. I just happen to be, like everyone else, a Mao Master...(not Mike, I am NOT a "worn out commie"π, and couldn't help but make comparisons to the one miserable thing I can relate to. I donate all my -13 points to Chessnut because he is an Apostle π and I an FT, and I would like 382 points for my grovelling π
Sorry to drag to honorable Mr. von Strudelheimer in to this.
I give my newfound deficit to StarValleyWy, because he'll be nicer about receiving it, and I shall begin signing my posts "Chairman Chicken" in honour of this game of Argument Mao which Colin has so kindly brought forth.
~Chairman Chicken
PS I pride myself on being a hell of a lot nicer than Mr. Tse-Tung.
Originally posted by royalchickenLook royalchicken, PAG is a bit of harmless fun; Mao is an evil card game that gives maths students a bad name. (For some reason, the only Mao players I know are maths students; other students have more common sense.)
in honour of this game of Argument Mao which Colin has so kindly brought forth.
Originally posted by Acolyteyou must be right cause i'v never played the game and i hate mathπ
Look royalchicken, PAG is a bit of harmless fun; Mao is an evil card game that gives maths students a bad name. (For some reason, the only Mao players I know are maths students; other students have more common sense.)
Originally posted by AcolytePAG is grand,
Look royalchicken, PAG is a bit of harmless fun; Mao is an evil card game that gives maths students a bad name. (For some reason, the only Mao players I know are maths students; other students have more common sense.)
PAG is supreme,
PAG is the best game,
To play is a dream.
Mao is absurd,
Mao really sucks,
Those who play Mao,
Have the IQs of ducks.
Happy π?
As to the nature of Mao players, I'll just say I learned it from fellow students in a class on axiomatic set theory. You may be right.