@fmf saidThis might be true, if and only if both of you were not guilty of being hypocrites and having no principle in the first place.
As I have said numerous times, the way Suzianne uses the word hypocrite incorrectly over and over again, suggests that she doesn't really know what it means, which means, in turn, that she may not have much of value to contribute to a thread on hypocrisy.
Since this is not the case, it's also shown that your first statement, that I somehow use the words "incorrectly" is untrue. This, of course, means that a thread by you on hypocrisy would be nothing more than self-serving mush.
@lemondrop saidLemon,
super girl and the ghost are tight
just like you and the gooster
Who are you referring to when you say gooster?
It is a pretty well known fact that Suzie Q and goad are very close. I've never seen one say anything to the other about any subject, that would be controversial. Have you?
-VR
@very-rusty saidI have better things to do
Lemon,
Who are you referring to when you say gooster?
It is a pretty well known fact that Suzie Q and goad are very close. I've never seen one say anything to the other about any subject, that would be controversial. Have you?
-VR
@lemondrop saidJust say you don't want to say who you are referring to when you say gooster.
I have better things to do
Also you wouldn't be able to find anything Suzie Q and goad said to each other, that was controversial.
Better than avoiding it by saying you have better things to do. You were the one commented on it to begin with.
-VR
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
@very-rusty saidI disagree with Suzianne frequently and vice versa. Perhaps if you ventured into the SF. (Rhetorical. Don't do that for God's sake).
Lemon,
Who are you referring to when you say gooster?
It is a pretty well known fact that Suzie Q and goad are very close. I've never seen one say anything to the other about any subject, that would be controversial. Have you?
-VR
10 Apr 21
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI'll tell them goad suggested I go the SF. I am sure they are not that controversial without even looking. You and Suzie Q are quite close which is not secret to anyone in the GF! 😉
I disagree with Suzianne frequently and vice versa. Perhaps if you ventured into the SF. (Rhetorical. Don't do that for God's sake).
-VR
@ghost-of-a-duke saidPerhaps, but don’t think I’ve ever noticed.
I disagree with Suzianne frequently and vice versa.
@suzianne saidIt's been dormant since he left. If it was ever "a creepy, private club that makes and keeps notes on RHP users", as you suggest, then Ghost of a Duke was an integral part of it.
It is still a creepy, private club that makes and keeps notes on RHP users, and not surprisingly, Ghost of a Duke is no longer there.
@suzianne saidYou use it incorrectly all the time. Hypocrisy is engaging in the same behaviour for which one criticizes another person. You just use it when you are upset and disagree with people. It means something specific. You, meanwhile, engage in the same behaviour for which you criticize other people constantly, perhaps more than anyone else on this website
This might be true, if and only if both of you were not guilty of being hypocrites and having no principle in the first place.
Since this is not the case, it's also shown that your first statement, that I somehow use the words "incorrectly" is untrue. This, of course, means that a thread by you on hypocrisy would be nothing more than self-serving mush.
@suzianne saidI don't think you are right. I have been cogent and uncontroversial. Relentless Red has been the only poster contributing "self-serving mush". If you can't see that, and if you genuinely think what I have said on that thread is "mush", then it only strengthens the perception that you don't quite know what "hypocrisy" means.
This, of course, means that a thread by you on hypocrisy would be nothing more than self-serving mush.
@suzianne saidWhat about you? Do you agree with this definition?Hypocrisy is engaging in the same behaviour for which one criticizes another person. Do you accept this definition? Furthermore, do you believe hypocrisy is unprincipled behaviour? Two questions: yes or no, in both cases.
This could be explained by you having no idea what hypocrisy or principle means.
12 Apr 21
@fmf saidIt appears she is stuck for words to answer your simple questions.
What about you? Do you agree with this definition?Hypocrisy is engaging in the same behaviour for which one criticizes another person. Do you accept this definition? Furthermore, do you believe hypocrisy is unprincipled behaviour? Two questions: yes or no, in both cases.
-VR