29 May 12
Originally posted by rookie54Nah - the "choice" the particle made in the past influenced the way he made his decision. He thinks he made that decision himself, but he just doesn't have any free will - quantum entanglement decides his every mood and thought.
Consider an experiment that was recently published in the journal Science showing that scientists could retroactively change something that had happened in the past. Particles had to decide how to behave when they hit a beam splitter. Later on, the experimenter could turn a second switch on or off. It turns out that what the observer decided at that point, determined what the particle did in the past.
Unless, of course, he was using thiotimoline.
Richard
29 May 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou, maybe. Most of us are just bored - seen it all before, same old excrement. If you can learn something from an average GB post, your teachers did a lousy job.
meh shouldn't people cut GB some slack? so he's a little condescending, so he attaches his opinions to items, so he's not Jesus, you gotta admit though that its an education to read his posts and we generally learn something every time, or at very least are made to think.
Richard
29 May 12
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou keep quoting this, moniker attached as if that made you a bigger boy.
"Please edit quoted text responsibly. Making modifications which misrepresent the original post will result in a forum ban."
-Russ
Have you even once had the balls to lodge an actual complaint with the Russ you so love to quote?
I say you don't. You're a blowhard, an empty shell, a louse more than a human being. You wouldn't dare do what you threaten. Like the Teabaggers you revere, you make a great puff-up show, but you're actually too scared to be your own man.
Every time you quote the forum TOC, you prove yourself worthless even more than before.
Richard
29 May 12
Originally posted by sonhouseGB understands crap.
Better add women to that list.
Cosmology, Statistical Physics, organic chemistry, metallurgy, genetics, nuclear engineering. You might want to reconsider your stance.
So it's a great topic if YOU write it but if Grampy Bobby writes it, it's crap?