General
27 Dec 20
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSpare me your condensation goad! That is when water build up on a window FYI! 😛 😉
I just replied to the post in the 'Controversial Secrets You Wish You Had' thread. (To jog your memory).
Perhaps concern yourself about your own memory such as having one the GBalert script which was another of your many lies told on here.
-VR
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
@very-rusty saidNot to be condescending, but did you conflate condensation with condescension?
Spare me your condensation goad! That is when water build up on a window FYI! 😛 😉
17 Jan 21
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNO, I got it right condensation: Condensation is the process where water vapor becomes liquid. It is the reverse of evaporation, where liquid water becomes a vapor. Condensation happens one of two ways: Either the air is cooled to its dew point or it becomes so saturated with water vapor that it cannot hold any more water.
Not to be condescending, but did you conflate condensation with condescension?
To spell it out what happens when you say things goad, although now that you mention it condescending would also apply to you, thanks for walking into that with your eyes wide open! 😉 😛
-VR
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
@very-rusty saidBut you replied, "Spare me your condensation goad!"
NO, I got it right condensation
On what planet does that make sense?
17 Jan 21
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI knew you would correct it immediately because you are so predictable goad.
But you replied, "Spare me your condensation goad!"
On what planet does that make sense?
You are like condensation collecting on an object! 😉 I did get the word correct, and manage to irritate someone who can not be irritated in their own humble opinion. 😉
-VR
Suzianne, you believe that thumbs up and thumbs down NOT being anonymous would be effectively a form of censorshop and would undermine free speech. Do you also see the fact that people are not permitted to thumb up their own posts anonymously as being a curtailment of their freedom of speech?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidOn a planet where people just ignore other people whom they wish to avoid.
On what planet does that make sense?
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
@divegeester saidBut Kelly ignored you for years, and yet you carried on replying to his posts.
On a planet where people just ignore other people whom they wish to avoid.
15 Feb 21
@ghost-of-a-duke said57) Let bygones, be bygones.
But Kelly ignored you for years, and yet you carried on replying to his posts.
Thanks goad for proving my point on why this rule would never work! 🙂 😛
-VR
15 Feb 21
@fmf saidWe don't have a say in our own posts it appears only others can thumb them....LOL....Lets just not pay so much attention to the thumbs in the future!
Suzianne, you believe that thumbs up and thumbs down NOT being anonymous would be effectively a form of censorshop and would undermine free speech. Do you also see the fact that people are not permitted to thumb up their own posts anonymously as being a curtailment of their freedom of speech?
-VR
16 Feb 21
1 edit
@very-rusty saidWhen I do answer your inane questions, next thing out of your mouth is that I answer every one of your posts. Can't have it both ways, Mr. Fragile.
All I did is repeat the truth told to you by another poster Suzie Q, fragile feelings?
You did noticeably not answer that poster's post or mine....Ever try Politics you are great at dodging answers, something you learned from goad?
-VR
@divegeester saidIs this an example of 'letting bygones be bygones', a sentiment you said that you agreed with?
Did you buy the 650 Suzuki or just take riding lessons?
I'd much rather people just not answer harassment instead of mumbling some nice words to agree with others and then get right back on the harassment train.
Not surprised that your 'donations' to the website have given you unlimited freedom to harass other users, but I am disappointed that management has taken that option, rather than forgo the monetary gain in the name of principle.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIrrelevant, I wanted to talk to him, you complain about Very Rusty’s posting all the time, you even formed your club in order to avoid him.
But Kelly ignored you for years, and yet you carried on replying to his posts.
It’s weird then that, like Suzianne, you spend the majority of your time chasing him around the general forum goading him to post even more and bringing yourself down to his level.
You must secretly enjoy your interactions with him, or perhaps see yourself as the forum’s Very Rusty monitor, the “not to be messed with” hero of the masses. Either way it’s interesting.
@suzianne saidNo, me asking you if you ever bought the motorcycle is just a question about a claim you made about yourself, one which I felt was either (another) lie, or simply very dangerous.
Is this an example of 'letting bygones be bygones', a sentiment you said that you agreed with?
Part of me was concerned for your safety as you had never ridden I bike before, another other part was incredulous at the ridiculous claim you were making.
Anyway, when I asked you about it you went into near hysterics about misogyny which told me everything I needed to know about your claim and little bit more about you and your honesty.
@suzianne saidWhat on earth are you on about, what “donations”?
Not surprised that your 'donations' to the website have given you unlimited freedom to harass other users, but I am disappointed that management has taken that option, rather than forgo the monetary gain in the name of principle.
Paranoid at all?