16 Jul 16
FMF: "but I still wouldn't describe myself as "bullied".The way you are framing your definition of "bullying" - to non-partisan eyes - would apply just as much to me as it applies to Grampy Bobby. For what it's worth, neither of us are "bullied", unless the accusation you made about the porn spam is true. That'd count as "bullying" I reckon.
Originally posted by josephw
Nobody said you were. BTW, it's not about you.
Originally posted by josephwSir,
Possibly. Only VR can clear that up.
I was refering to the posts made in this thread that should be removed by the Moderators. Some of them are just disgusting, no other words for it. I had felt that GB was being bullied and helped him out in the forums for a period of time. Then I realized he could handle the bullies quite well on his own and didn't really need me. A lot of you will remember those days.
Sincerely,
-VR
Originally posted by KeggeSir,
Read the goddamn forum again woman. You are deranged if you believe he hasn't atacked numerous people over the years on these forums.
There you go with your cursing again, must I remind you that you don't scare anyone just make yourself look bad. By the way: "Atacked" is Spelled "Attacked! 😛 I'm not even great with spelling or grammar, ask anyone who has been around for years.
Kind Regards,
Have a Great Day,
Sincerely,
-VR
Originally posted by Very Rustysigh
Sir,
There you go with your cursing again, must I remind you that you don't scare anyone just make yourself look bad. By the way: "Atacked" is Spelled "Attacked! 😛 I'm not even great with spelling or grammar, ask anyone who has been around for years.
Kind Regards,
Have a Great Day,
Sincerely,
-VR
Originally posted by Andrew KernHow on earth, in your mind, is responding in thread on a correspondence forum viewed as "selfish" or "attention seeking"?
Why are you guys so selfish? Grampy Bobby was (and still is) the greatest person thread-wise, and you are bringing the attention to yourself?
Read Very Rusty's last comment on page 7. I definately agree.
Originally posted by josephwGB is a passive-agressive poster who enjoys stirring the pot and bringing attention to himself by doing so. He is well able to defend himself and brings on himself all of the criticism he gets over the years. It is YOU who cannot cope with it and you transfer your online weediness onto him.
I think FMF is trying to minimize the level of criticism GB recieved as merely "par for the course", but in terms of frequency, volume and severity I'd say GB was bullied to the full.
Part of the fact of what makes the criticisms of GB so egregious was GB's refusal to engage defensively. He rose above it all, and that fueled their fire.
Originally posted by josephwI really think you should learn to read, Joe. If you have time, a bit of honest research into the past should open your eyes.
I think FMF is trying to minimize the level of criticism GB recieved as merely "par for the course", but in terms of frequency, volume and severity I'd say GB was bullied to the full.
Part of the fact of what makes the criticisms of GB so egregious was GB's refusal to engage defensively. He rose above it all, and that fueled their fire.
If you don't have time to dig up the facts, do us all a favor and shut up. Stick to what you know.. not much.