27 Dec 08
The post that was quoted here has been removedwhat's the point in reading an engine user's blog? that'll be like going to a neo-nazi website searching for objective information on ww2 death camps. whatever they'll say, it'll be just more lies and deliberate misinformation.
but anyway, I don't really give a crap about that ancient mod-foolery, I was just wondering if I missed out a christmas time meltdown. but it was all old news instead...
27 Dec 08
Originally posted by wormwoodActually it's worth visiting www.clausjensen.com because the long run of comments by various RHP people (including fake ones) is becoming the discussion on bannings that can't be posted on this site without risking a forum ban.
what's the point in reading an engine user's blog? that'll be like going to a neo-nazi website searching for objective information on ww2 death camps. whatever they'll say, it'll be just more lies and deliberate misinformation.
but anyway, I don't really give a crap about that ancient mod-foolery, I was just wondering if I missed out a christmas time meltdown. but it was all old news instead...
The unfortunate side-effect of "forum banning" people who disagree with forum moderators is that the fight spills over into areas where no moderation exists.
I know I'm risking a forum ban myself with this post, but PLEASE mister forum moderator, don't wield your ban stick too viciously - Jie has done nothing to justify a lifetime ban, if he had he'd be banned from the site. 3 days should be the maximum penalty in my opinion.
28 Dec 08
Originally posted by MissOleumPeople have been "permanently" banned from the Forums without being banned from the site before (Skeeter for one), so your statement is incorrect. I'm not exactly sure why Jie got a "lifetime" ban, but it's no big loss.
Actually it's worth visiting www.clausjensen.com because the long run of comments by various RHP people (including fake ones) is becoming the discussion on bannings that can't be posted on this site without risking a forum ban.
The unfortunate side-effect of "forum banning" people who disagree with forum moderators is that the fight spills over into a ...[text shortened]... he had he'd be banned from the site. 3 days should be the maximum penalty in my opinion.
I am alarmed at the way my OTB rating is plummeting on his blog.
28 Dec 08
Originally posted by MissOleumAlways have respected your courage, sense of fairness and principle, and respect for our mother tongue. You're a rare piece of work, Gal.
Actually it's worth visiting www.clausjensen.com because the long run of comments by various RHP people (including fake ones) is becoming the discussion on bannings that can't be posted on this site without risking a forum ban.
The unfortunate side-effect of "forum banning" people who disagree with forum moderators is that the fight spills over into a ...[text shortened]... he had he'd be banned from the site. 3 days should be the maximum penalty in my opinion.
28 Dec 08
Originally posted by no1marauderFree Skeeter, please Russ 🙁
People have been "permanently" banned from the Forums without being banned from the site before (Skeeter for one), so your statement is incorrect. I'm not exactly sure why Jie got a "lifetime" ban, but it's no big loss.
I am alarmed at the way my OTB rating is plummeting on his blog.