Originally posted by EcstremeVenomYou see, it's not about the full credit. I cannot change the score I got on the original essay.
if you did want a full credit, you could squeeze in one sentence describing a victory by your favorite chess player much like you did with your favorite quote of your favorite chess player
My aim in this essay is: TO SHOW HOW GOOD one can be IN REVISING a paper he-she wrote.
However, as you said the new paper looks crappy compared to the original.
Originally posted by Officer DibbleI agree with you. Let me give you a short real-life story.
what a generous marking system! i went through school and university with good marks (in those days i used capital letters and everything!) and never received higher than 80% for anything. a normal good score was 60%.
anyway, i'd help with the essay, but i don't like chess.
I met my American wife at my university in my country I grew up. I married her and moved to USA.
I continue school here and I find school real eeze so far.
Now I know why my wife got all As and Bs in university.
In my country getting a "C" is real tough work. and only one person (or a few at most) gets an A in a class, mostly the best people in the whole faculty.
There's an inflation of grades in the USA buty I cannot complain.
Hey guys,
It's the stupid ol' G again π
I have revised the whole paper. Now, I need opinions before I submit it tomoorow. How is it?
Suggestions and opinions welcomed.
-----------------------------------
My Chess Addiction
I love chess because it is an entertaining, psychological strategy game. Playing chess regularly helps me control my emotions and improve my critical thinking skills. A great way to socialize with people and make new friends, the game satisfies my competitive spirit. I tremendously enjoy playing chess, solving chess tactics, reading chess literature, and keeping my opening theory up-to-date especially by adding novelty moves of the chess masters to my opening repertoire. Chess is not just a game. It is a whole other lifestyle when one plays at a competitive level.
Chess is the only board game I do not find boring. I also play backgammon because it is a very popular board game where I was raised. Chess, however, inspires me. This age-old game has evolved into many styles of play. One way is the traditional face-to-face over-the-board chess. Another is correspondence chess which is played via mail, e-mail or more recently, online. Currently a member of the United States Chess Federation, I have played over-the-board tournaments but I enjoy correspondence chess more for its convenience. This form of play allows me to deeply analyze the positions without having to worry about time trouble. Occasionally, I will consider a move for an entire week, mesmerized by the possibilities.
Chess is a creative strategy game. In any given game, I can earn a well-deserved victory with my skills or create my own self-destruction. Chess is not a game of luck; it is based on pure science, logical thinking and immense creativity. Scientifically there is always one “best” move on the board that can be generated with the help of advanced computer programs. This does not mean one must always make this “best” move to gain a victory in a game of chess. One can be a gifted, reckless attacking player full of tactical vision or a hard-working defensive genius with excellent endgame technique. Beyond this, time is a determining factor in the sway of the game. It is extremely important to be efficient when managing the chess clock because everybody has an equally limited amount of time. The more experienced one is, the more confidently one may decide how much time is needed for each move. Time management is vital and strategically useful when playing chess.
Learning to play chess is moderately easy but winning a game of chess is not. One must be psychologically ready. One bad move may ruin a game. The player must be alert to the many tactical possibilities, fully concentrated on his or her next move and overall plan. Most importantly, one should consider his or her opponent’s best plan and psychology. It is not only one’s knowledge but also the opponent’s knowledge and temperament affecting the state of affairs in chess. Legendary grandmaster Alekhine summarized the psychological aspects of the game effectively: “One has to have a knowledge of human nature and the opponent’s psychology for the purpose of the chess struggle. In earlier times, the struggle was conducted only by means of the pieces, we, on the other hand, struggle (or at least try to struggle) with our opponent, our enemy, with his will-power, his nerves, his individual characteristics and last but not least with his vanity.”
Chess requires a subtle, calm, patient and clever mind, able to outthink an opponent with calculative skills and long-term memory. For three millennia, chess has been considered the ultimate psychological war game and I imagine chess will be for millennia to come.
Originally posted by GinoJYour essay has a great "body" but neither an opening nor closing paragraph. You have no introduction. Your first paragraph would have been an introduction had the rest of the essay gone into further depth about the topics you introduced. You also need a conclusion that ties it all together.
Hey guys,
It's the stupid ol' G again π
I have revised the whole paper. Now, I need opinions before I submit it tomoorow. How is it?
Suggestions and opinions welcomed.
-----------------------------------
My Chess Addiction
I love chess because it is an entertaining, psychological strategy game. Playing chess regularly helps me control my ...[text shortened]... sidered the ultimate psychological war game and I imagine chess will be for millennia to come.
Originally posted by reader1107Intro is how I love chess and I agree the conclusion is not that great. Maybe a few more sentences are needed.
Your essay has a great "body" but neither an opening nor closing paragraph. You have no introduction. Your first paragraph would have been an introduction had the rest of the essay gone into further depth about the topics you introduced. You also need a conclusion that ties it all together.
Originally posted by GinoJNo. If your first paragraph is your intro, then the rest of your essay has to be about what you mentioned in your intro. It can't be about other things.
Intro is how I love chess and I agree the conclusion is not that great. Maybe a few more sentences are needed.
quote: I love chess because it is an entertaining, psychological strategy game. Playing chess regularly helps me control my emotions and improve my critical thinking skills. A great way to socialize with people and make new friends, the game satisfies my competitive spirit. I tremendously enjoy playing chess, solving chess tactics, reading chess literature, and keeping my opening theory up-to-date especially by adding novelty moves of the chess masters to my opening repertoire. Chess is not just a game. It is a whole other lifestyle when one plays at a competitive level.
Those are the things you must discuss in the rest of the essay, if this is your introduction. HOW does it help you control your emotions... etc.? HOW is it a great way to socialize...? What books have you read? Etc. If the above is your intro, the rest of your essay addresses these questions.
Originally posted by reader1107There is no such thing as "has to" and or "have to" in creative writing. However you have great opinions.
No. If your first paragraph is your intro, then the rest of your essay has to be about what you mentioned in your intro. It can't be about other things.
quote: I love chess because it is an entertaining, psychological strategy game. Playing chess regularly helps me control my emotions and improve my critical thinking skills. A great way to socialize ...[text shortened]... you read? Etc. If the above is your intro, the rest of your essay addresses these questions.
Originally posted by GinoJI love chess because it is an entertaining, psychological strategy game. Playing chess regularly helps me control my emotions and improve my critical thinking skills. A great way to socialize with people and make new friends, the game satisfies my competitive spirit. I tremendously enjoy playing chess, solving chess tactics, reading chess literature, and
Hey guys,
It's the stupid ol' G again π
I have revised the whole paper. Now, I need opinions before I submit it tomoorow. How is it?
Suggestions and opinions welcomed.
-----------------------------------
My Chess Addiction
I love chess because it is an entertaining, psychological strategy game. Playing chess regularly helps me control my ...[text shortened]... sidered the ultimate psychological war game and I imagine chess will be for millennia to come.
May I advise you? "I love chess"........ maybe I 'appreciate', " I delight in chess".. (I love my car. not......... only family and heart felt emotions are expected to be 'loved'.)
because I believe it to be an.........
I think that chess regularly..........
the game satisfies my competitive spirit and enables me to..socialize with people ....
Think about your own proof of what you dictate verbally on paper without proof. If you find mt first 2 sentence analysis of help then pms me. It is only wording strategy......
leave the HOW answer to the QUESTION ANALYST........ he is looking for options and get out clauses to your Qs!! He hasn't the answer to his own HOW..... so bear that in mind!!
(have only read last page of thread so this may have been mentioend already)
Essays are not normally written in the first person, and facts taken from elsewhere are supported by citations, these then listed in full at the end of the essay:
E.g.
"I love chess because it is an entertaining, psychological strategy game."
becomes
"Chess is an entertaining, psychological strategy game." (citation if appropriate)
Originally posted by rhbHowever, they are all my original thoughts besides the quote of Alekhine from Kotov's book Think Like a Grandmaster.
(have only read last page of thread so this may have been mentioend already)
Essays are not normally written in the first person, and facts taken from elsewhere are supported by citations, these then listed in full at the end of the essay:
E.g.
"I love chess because it is an entertaining, psychological strategy game."
becomes
"Chess is an entertaining, psychological strategy game." (citation if appropriate)
edit: I thought there's a problem in voice too. I could not figure it out. π
Originally posted by GinoJI think you are missing the point of what an essay is then (unless it's done differently where you are).
However, they are all my original thoughts besides the quote of Alekhine from Kotov's book Think Like a Grandmaster.
edit: I thought there's a problem in voice too. I could not figure it out. π
An Essay presents researched facts from Primary and Secondary sources of information (original texts, and articles about texts). You can add your own opinion in at the right place to make the essay your own work, but this should be commentary supported by your research.
Writing in the first person is a no-no. Google essay writing for some tips (but don't cite these in your essay π)