16 Nov 07
Originally posted by rubberjaw30We don't have to kill him. The reason why we should have invaded Afghanistan is PR reasons we would have had more support from NATO and countries in the middle east. The reason this happens is because people will still think that we are looking for Bin Laden even if we aren't although I think that we should have captured him instead of letting the people of Afghanistan think that we couldn't.
correct that we aren't really looking for him. killing him gives the jihadists a martyr, and bin Laden's powerless as it is. it's better for us to let him live powerless than to have a martyr to oppose. Believe me, we are in big trouble if someone in his circle decides to collect on the FBI's $25 million reward.
16 Nov 07
1 edit
POSTED BY RUBBER JAW
I'm not going to try to preach to you guys, but as far as I'm concerned, God sees that we are in the right, and he will see to it that we are victorious, and all will eventually enjoy civil liberty. Only then can Miss America's ideal of world peace be achieved.
How dissillisioned can 'your' country make you man?
That is disgraceful.
16 Nov 07
Originally posted by jimslyp69So you believe in demeaning women. Notice the lack of the question mark as this is a statement not a question.
POSTED BY RUBBER JAW
I'm not going to try to preach to you guys, but as far as I'm concerned, God sees that we are in the right, and he will see to it that we are victorious, and all will eventually enjoy civil liberty. Only then can Miss America's ideal of world peace be achieved.
How dissillisioned can 'your' country make you man?
That is disgraceful.
16 Nov 07
Originally posted by jimslyp69I take you out of context once and you must return the favor, right?
I just fail to see how creating a zone of where there are constant kilings, day in, day out, can possibly be right. Can you? For Oil rights you say? If that's your best argument then you can F^ck right off. you cold calculating SHYTE
well, if you check back, I said that the pig politicians are in Iraq for oil, but I support the war because I support the goal that we are in effect furthering human rights. It matters not to me that some politician is getting his pockets lined, he'll have to answer for that when Judgement comes. What freedom has ever come without bloodshed? I'm sure you can provide some examples, but there aren't many.
16 Nov 07
Originally posted by jimslyp69tomtom did me a favor, and has already responded as I would have.
POSTED BY RUBBER JAW
I'm not going to try to preach to you guys, but as far as I'm concerned, God sees that we are in the right, and he will see to it that we are victorious, and all will eventually enjoy civil liberty. Only then can Miss America's ideal of world peace be achieved.
How dissillisioned can 'your' country make you man?
That is disgraceful.
16 Nov 07
Originally posted by rubberjaw30Yup. Let's carry on the blood shed. Day in day out. It is good. And God bless America. Over and out.
I take you out of context once and you must return the favor, right?
well, if you check back, I said that the pig politicians are in Iraq for oil, but I support the war because I support the goal that we are in effect furthering human rights. It matters not to me that some politician is getting his pockets lined, he'll have to answer for that when Judge ...[text shortened]... s ever come without bloodshed? I'm sure you can provide some examples, but there aren't many.
16 Nov 07
Originally posted by tomtom232This war was nothing to do with liberating women. How much crap can you spout?
So you believe in demeaning women. Notice the lack of the question mark as this is a statement not a question.
If that was the case why didn't you go trounce all ove a multitude of other countries?
16 Nov 07
Originally posted by jimslyp69are you saying that you'd rather live day in and day out knowing that somewhere in the world an innocent woman is taking a public beating?
Yup. Let's carry on the blood shed. Day in day out. It is good. And God bless America. Over and out.
some things are just worth fighting for... and I can not and will not try to convince you of what those things are. you have to find that list within yourself.
16 Nov 07
2 edits
Originally posted by rubberjaw30This war was nothing to do with liberating women. How much crap can you spout?
are you saying that you'd rather live day in and day out knowing that somewhere in the world an innocent woman is taking a public beating?
some things are just worth fighting for... and I can not and will not try to convince you of what those things are. you have to find that list within yourself.
If that was the case why didn't you go trounce all ove a multitude of other countries?
I've heard women in China get a raw deal.
Why not sort them out?
That's just the tip o the ice berg dude when it comes to people having their human rights stomped all over.
You said in another post that it's all about the oil. And that ,y friend is all it is about.
So there we have it.
16 Nov 07
Originally posted by jimslyp69you're bouncing over our points, and honing in on the oil-lovers.
This war was nothing to do with liberating women. How much crap can you spout?
If that was the case why didn't you go trounce all ove a multitude of other countries?
let's list facts in order to get to what we are telling you.
Politicians love money.
Politician know that there is a lot of money in oil.
Politicians would lead their country to war under the pretense of WMDs, just to secure their oil reserves.
This war has, as a side effect, liberated thousands of women, greatly enhancing their social status.
This effect is why I (and tomtom, as well, I'd wager) support the war.
We agree that we did not go to war for the right reasons, but we should certainly agree that the side effedct is well worth a few politicians getting their wants.