Go back
Player castled after having previously moved King and previously been in check...

Player castled after having previously moved King and previously been in check...

Help

A Unique Nickname

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
19036
Clock
15 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Don't ask anything about a game in progress. TOS 3(b). Do I need to say more?
if you want to be proven wrong do as i ask. not everyone is a no no to talk about when the game is in progress. simple common sense.

STS

Joined
07 Feb 07
Moves
62961
Clock
15 Mar 10

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Don't ask anything about a game in progress. TOS 3(b). Do I need to say more?
No you've said quite enough now please shut up .

He wasn't asking for help you're being a pain.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
16 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
No you've said quite enough now please shut up .

He wasn't asking for help you're being a pain.
I didn't comment you, neither theshepherds, only trev.
I'm happy that you think I've stated my point clearly and you that agree.
TOS 3(b) says that you cannot ask for help in a game in progress. Enough said.

t
Pawn Boy

Oerlikon

Joined
28 Dec 09
Moves
17198
Clock
16 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Don't ask anything about a game in progress. TOS 3(b). Do I need to say more?
I was asking what rules were in place, clearly it was a rhetorical question as I believe he had castled when not allowed to. It is perfectly acceptable for me to question if a rule enforcement had failed on the part of the engine.

Before you jumped in, I had already withdrawn the question as I had realised my mistake (Playing on a small IPhone, when the game log reverses the board, hey, gimme a break)

TOS 3(b) as you repeatedly quote , does not apply and is not relevant to my question.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
17 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by theshepherds
I was asking what rules were in place, clearly it was a rhetorical question as I believe he had castled when not allowed to. It is perfectly acceptable for me to question if a rule enforcement had failed on the part of the engine.

Before you jumped in, I had already withdrawn the question as I had realised my mistake (Playing on a small IPhone, when ...[text shortened]... break)

TOS 3(b) as you repeatedly quote , does not apply and is not relevant to my question.
I just commented in general. Not directed to you specifically.

I've mentionned later about the TOS 3(b), this was not directed to you specifically. I made it clearer about the difference between asking about a game in progress, and asking a general question about chess rules. I think the TOS 3(b) says it quite clearly in the text. I don't have to repeat it.

The discussion is over on my part, as everyone seem to have understood my point.

r

Joined
24 Jun 08
Moves
50
Clock
17 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Don't ask anything about a game in progress. TOS 3(b). Do I need to say more?
Are chess engines allowed during the game? Do I need to say more?

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
17 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ratherbighammer
Are chess engines allowed during the game? Do I need to say more?
TOS 3(b) says:
"While a game is in progress you may not refer to chess engines, chess computers or be assisted by a third party. Endgame tablebases may not be consulted during play but you may reference books, databases consisting of previously played games between human players, and other pre-existing research materials."

A Unique Nickname

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
19036
Clock
17 Mar 10
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
I just commented in general. Not directed to you specifically.

I've mentionned later about the TOS 3(b), this was not directed to you specifically. I made it clearer about the difference between asking about a game in progress, and asking a general question about chess rules. I think the TOS 3(b) says it quite clearly in the text. I don't have to repeat it.

The discussion is over on my part, as everyone seem to have understood my point.
understood and disagreed with.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.