Originally posted by checkmate99Blitz00 said, "Here are some games can some of you analyze my style of play?"
I disagree with arrakis, your play is not positional. In fact, most of your moves appear to occur without any positional considerations at all.
Take this game, for example:
Game 958278[/
6. Nxc6 is a positional blunder. You exchange your centrally positioned knight that you've already moved twice (who might move to f3 or b3, but only afte ...[text shortened]... positional play.
Since we're around the same rating, why don't you challenge me to a game?
My post refers to his style of play, not the quality of being able to make positional judgements based on playing strength.
One can tell by the player's moves if they play for attack (tactical) or try to play positional chess. He's more comfortable trying to play positional chess, so that's why he will do better with positional openings like 1.d4 followed by 2.c4 (Queen's Pawn) or even 1.c4 (English).