Originally posted by CenterNutI also asked that nobody comment on the game. And as I mentioned in my analysis, I was never in a losing position, which explains why I didn't lose. I also stated that I wasn't accusing you of cheating, but I was suspicious.
Dfthd posted our game while it was in progress asking other players to check it out with fritz because he was in a losing posistion. And was practically calling me a cheater, which kinda made me mad so I called him that. and prepaired to take the punisment if I get banned np.
Originally posted by ark13I will probably get more. My rating is due to me making "look for 3 seconds and click" moves, but this game was important and I spent up to 30 mins on one move. I thought for 5-10 mins at least unless I had calculated the variation.
Okay, ready for a compliment? You are both high enough rated that you can expect an agreement of something up to 50%. Beyond that may be a bit suspicious.
I think if you look at some of my more recent games.. games where I have left the "london system" and played more aggressive openings I've been pushing for space as I know now its an advantage, if you look at my graph you can see a nice slope going upwards where I have been more agrressive and winning openings. it was a natural set of moves for me to play there was nothing complicated about it and you thought I was cheating.
Originally posted by DfthdMost of your moves were in the top 3 on fritz, but that's not surprising at all. Everyone but CenterNut knows you didn't cheat.
I will probably get more. My rating is due to me making "look for 3 seconds and click" moves, but this game was important and I spent up to 30 mins on one move. I thought for 5-10 mins at least unless I had calculated the variation.
Only Dfthd knows the truth. But i would still love to play him face2face but that is never going to happen. And he knows if he did use anything then he hasn't really won. but if not gg well played. After the opening he had he sure did bounce back.
And ark13 for you to also get suspicious makes 2 people now. We will see what others think also comments about suspicious moves are welcome.
Originally posted by CenterNutYes we've heard your opinion, and heard it, and heard it ....
all im doing is posting my comments on how I feal about db's and opening books yes I know there allowed on this site and yes i know its not cheating on this site, you're the ignorant one for not allowing others to post their views. And if I see a thread which talks about db+opening books in all the cases in past have been I will post my comments and luck ...[text shortened]... or me you arnt the mod. only advantage to that would be RHP have more hdd space for your babbel.
I had difficulty understanding this conversation, so I ran it through a machine translator via a human editor. For those of you who are not so well versed in English, here's some translations:
Letter from Editor
im = I'm (not a word seen much in English these days having fallen out of favour since Elizabethan times, so much so that it's original usage has been lost. Our translator suggests the writer is using an acronym for "I am".)
feal = feel (perhaps a play on fealty ie a feudal loyalty to a lord ie a sworn loyalty but more probably refers to an emotional or physical sensation).
i = I (an expression of disgust in many languages but in modern English probably means 'I' as 'I am the person wot rote this sentecne'.
there = they're (in this context not used as a place or a direction. What the writer probably means is 'they are'😉.
arnt = aren't (No record found - surely a typo? Must speak to the sub-editors).
babbel = babble (Perhaps referring to Babel - a scene of noise and confusion but our best guess is an incoherent jumble of words).
Extra comment: The first letter of sentences are usually capitalised. This would help in not crashing our translator.
I hope this helps.
The Ed
Originally posted by CenterNutif a player plays well, then an awful lot of the moves a person plays will either be fritz's first 2nd or third choise moves a
move 6 was your 1st out of book move. and I looking at moves from move 16 I was thinking you was using something. and there are lots of moves from about 16 that fritz suggest or when you click hint. it plays your moves.. very suspect if you ask me.
Like i said this game was far to importent to your ego and if needed like after move 6 you would use additio ...[text shortened]... ame prooves im no cheat. i'd rather be a loser than a cheat. at least I can say I lost my way.
I played one otb game against a much stronger opponent where i deliberately went rook and bishop down to get a winning pawn advantage endgame
i was pleasantly supprised when i put it in fritz that it agreed with all my moves at that point in the game
it does happen that fritz agrees with us, there only so many viable moves in any position that we have to have similar thoughts as fritz sometimes
your all a bunch of narsty people. even this thread is a demostration of an attempt to unsettle another person which I see on many threads. And also a way to say look at me I won a game wow haa
shows how really feeble you all are. None of you are the greatest players including myself but you all act like super gm's. I think thats probably why only 2-3 people with ratings over 2000 post here because they cant bare it.
Originally posted by CenterNutIf you did indeed send those offensive messages to your opponent, you've lost any right to call anyone 'nasty'...look in the mirror.
your all a bunch of narsty people. even this thread is a demostration of an attempt to unsettle another person which I see on many threads. And also a way to say look at me I won a game wow haa
shows how really feeble you all are. None of you are the greatest players including myself but you all act like super gm's. I think thats probably why only 2-3 people with ratings over 2000 post here because they cant bare it.
Originally posted by CenterNutI still don't see how I "bounced back" from the opening. I locked the pawns on the queenside as I planned to do and for the most part prevented counterplay from you. I think it was you who pushed your pawns too far and failed to open the position, but even if you did, I hadn't played the commital f5 yet so my king would be in no danger.
Only Dfthd knows the truth. But i would still love to play him face2face but that is never going to happen. And he knows if he did use anything then he hasn't really won. but if not gg well played. After the opening he had he sure did bo ...[text shortened]... hat others think also comments about suspicious moves are welcome.
What I mean is my play didn't "suddenly change" from bad to good or vice versa.
Oh, and this is not me taking advantage of the situation to say OOO LOOK AT ME I CAN PLAY CHESS. You got pwned on the forums, you made alot of noise about it, then you challenge me , and considering you have hardly played against 1400s and never against 1500s, you "know" that these people cheat and NOOO they are not better than you, that would be impossible. Then you made alot of noise in game swearing and all and you still got pwned, and that's what I'm showing.
You wanted to show this game at about move six before I called you what I did. Reason I called you that was because of what you did, it was deleted from the forum because you was out of order. Now you make excuses about you wanted to lockup the queenside well why on earth did you post the game in the forum suggesting I was cheating.
The more you make excuses which I know are lies the more suspicious I am. I've looked though some of your game and you never send your kings defense into play. you played alot of moves which the computer suggested, and I know in a real game i'd whoooop you.
You seam amazed when you started to lose tempo and space disadvantage, from a little pawn attack you was like RaAHH he's cheating, then you post in the forum, then from a little pawn attack you win the game with queen sac, funnny how you can calculate moves for that but cant predict what im going to do with 2 pawns.