23 Oct 06
Originally posted by mazziewagDrunk? Is that what you call it?
Onyx here showing everyone why playing drunk isnt encouraged
Game 2326911
LOL.... nice one!!!
There is no excuse for black playing this way against the K G A. Not even drink!
- Joined
- 21 Apr 06
- Moves
- 4211
23 Oct 06
1 edit
Originally posted by XanthosNZThey dont write in their profiles that they are GMs. The king rank is a sign of a free account given to the GM (or those very good players who earn it manually) Slightly different to writing in your profile you are a gm but not stating which.
All the time on Playchess. Almost all the King rank players (indicating a GM that has been confirmed by Playchess) do not disclose which GM they are.
23 Oct 06
4 edits
Originally posted by mazziewagBrilliant?
What can i say, i was brilliant.
Maybe he was stoned?
If brilliant you would not have played 13. Re1?!
You played OK but he played particularly dreadful and you capitalised on it well. I can't tell you how many dreadful moves he made as there are too many of them but clearly 19. ... NXd5 was blacks crowning glory.
Could you have done as well with KGA against a player that was not drunk? Try User 240601, User 7277 or even User 219403 or another member of Clan 24529
23 Oct 06
Originally posted by Dragon Fireok i was clearly joking of course i wasnt playing brilliantly. does criticising make you feel good? how about a kings gambit game to see how well i fare?
Brilliant?
If brilliant you would not have played 13. Re1?!
You played OK but he played particularly dreadful and you capitalised on it well. I can't tell you haw many draedful moves he made as there are too amny of them but clearly 19. ... NXd5 was blacks crowning glory.
Could you have done as well with KGA against a player that was not drunk? Try User 240601, User 7277 or even User 219403
23 Oct 06
Originally posted by BedlamOh really than I suppose you can tell me who raffael is? He states he's a gm but dosen't say who.
They dont write in their profiles that they are GMs. The king rank is a sign of a free account given to the GM (or those very good players who earn it manually) Slightly different to writing in your profile you are a gm but not stating which.
23 Oct 06
Particularly proud of this one. I found it difficult to see that I had to promote Q just to sac it...
Game 2472708
23 Oct 06
Originally posted by malingaNot bad! Pretty scarey stuff. I suspect white could have played the ending better and got at least a draw but that doesn't detract from your solid win.
Particularly proud of this one. I found it difficult to see that I had to promote Q just to sac it...
Game 2472708
Weaker players note how a knight that is not supported by a king cannot stop 2 pawns.
23 Oct 06
ohh lots (after 1000+ games, I hope so). What's appalling is that I can't do it more often...
sorted by opponent, a mix of wins and draws. I think that all of these people have overall winning records against me.
Arrakis
Game 2504018
Game 2504034
GS
Game 1894357
GauravV
Game 1900846
Game 1894356
Gambit Accepted
Game 2083456
KaChong
Game 2005937
M1sty
Game 2003817
Red Night (we were both in the 1600 - 1699 band at this point)
Game 1996056
Game 1996075
Red Mike
Game 2312173
Game 2312174
Game 2215938
Quirine
Game 1564330
Many more agaist people who are better than me, but w/o the large rating gap.
23 Oct 06
Originally posted by zebanoThis just proves the point. If you play enough games you will regularly beat players rated above you. 25% of the time in fact for 200 rating points.
ohh lots (after 1000+ games, I hope so). What's appalling is that I can't do it more often...
sorted by opponent, a mix of wins and draws. I think that all of these people have overall winning records against me.
Arrakis
Game 2504018
Game 2504034
GS
Game 1894357
GauravV
Game 1900846
Game 1894356
Gambit Ac ...[text shortened]... 64330[/gid]
Many more agaist people who are better than me, but w/o the large rating gap.
However, I am prepared to bet you can find just as many embarassing losses to players rated below you.