Originally posted by acubed123It's a statement of it that is a pythagorean triple. If you have learnt the equation then you should know that triple considering it is the most common one around (excluding the 1, 1, sqrt(2)). Notice how every other person in the thread understood what it was.
this is not the pythagorean thrm .... maybe thats why she didnt recognize it as such
Originally posted by XanthosNZthis is a pythagorean triple 3^2+4^2=5^2 not 3^3+4^4=5^5 or 3*3 + 4*4 = 5*5 if u simplify it it isnt even a true equation .... all pythagorean tripples are of the form x^2+y^2=z^2 where x,y,z are positive integers
It's a statement of it that is a pythagorean triple. If you have learnt the equation then you should know that triple considering it is the most common one around (excluding the 1, 1, sqrt(2)). Notice how every other person in the thread understood what it was.
... go back and check what u previosly typed ... u typed 3*3 + 4*4 = 5*5 (not a pythagorean tripple) ... pythagoras (14 year old girl) immediately saw this and said . . . "what the heck"
Originally posted by acubed123I don't understand how you would get that from his post. 3*3 does NOT equal 3^3, it means 3 x 3 (3^2). The same goes for all the other numbers. The "*" symbol means multiplication, it is not a power symbol. "^" is the power symbol. What he wrote is correct, he just skipped a step and instead of writting 3^2 he wrote 3*3.
this is a pythagorean triple 3^2+4^2=5^2 not 3^3+4^4=5^5 or 3*3 + 4*4 = 5*5 if u simplify it it isnt even a true equation .... all pythagorean tripples are of the form x^2+y^2=z^2 where x,y,z are positive integers
... go back and check what u previosly typed ... u typed 3*3 + 4*4 = 5*5 (not a pythagorean tripple) ... pythagoras (14 year old girl) immediately saw this and said . . . "what the heck"
3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2
3*3 + 4*4 = 5*5
9 +16 = 25
25 = 25
Hopefully, there is no more confusion.
Originally posted by acubed123How do you know I was telling the truth when I said I was a 14 year old girl? I could be some phycotic old man in a home for the mentally unstable.
this is a pythagorean triple 3^2+4^2=5^2 not 3^3+4^4=5^5 or 3*3 + 4*4 = 5*5 if u simplify it it isnt even a true equation .... all pythagorean tripples are of the form x^2+y^2=z^2 where x,y,z are positive integers
... go back and check what u previosly typed ... u typed 3*3 + 4*4 = 5*5 (not a pythagorean tripple) ... pythagoras (14 year old girl) immediately saw this and said . . . "what the heck"
Originally posted by acubed123Learn to read. 3*3 = 3 x 3 = 3^2
this is a pythagorean triple 3^2+4^2=5^2 not 3^3+4^4=5^5 or 3*3 + 4*4 = 5*5 if u simplify it it isnt even a true equation .... all pythagorean tripples are of the form x^2+y^2=z^2 where x,y,z are positive integers
... go back and check what u previosly typed ... u typed 3*3 + 4*4 = 5*5 (not a pythagorean tripple) ... pythagoras (14 year old girl) immediately saw this and said . . . "what the heck"
Originally posted by Frank BurnsThank you for this useless post. Unlike you, I don't enjoy it when ignorant people spout off about topics that they know nothing about. At the end of the day, the people that are telling her to learn something before she opens her mouth are doing her more of a favor than you are.
Lighten up Dude, you're really coming off as a real dick. And you are impressing no one. You are a psuedo-intellectual.
Or perhaps you're a chick, and what would that make you?
It's quite obvious this young lady has taken the time to look into the things previous posts have taken her to task for. I say pythagoras rocks!
Originally posted by Balla88Wonderful response Einstein, did it occur to you that this could really be a 14 year old girl.
Thank you for this useless post. Unlike you, I don't enjoy it when ignorant people spout off about topics that they know nothing about. At the end of the day, the people that are telling her to learn something before she opens her mouth are doing her more of a favor than you are.
Are you a 14 year old too? Would that be chronologically or just mentally?
You're of no help, you are simply a crass individual. You're not related to Bowmann are you?
Shutup.
Get over yourself.
Originally posted by pythagorasIf you think you understand it then i'm sorry but you really really don't.
Well I hardly think it's my fault if my teachers have been neglegent. If this is any compensation, I know all about Einstein's theory of relativety, and I understand it too. I did a speech on it at school once.
Originally posted by acedwards
it all hinges around a knight either lining up a forked attack on two rooks as in your case, or taking a rook after placing the king in check with the knight.
Ehm,the last thing I was worried about was the knight fork,I resigned simply because ,after the forced Kg8, Nxe7 1-0.........
Originally posted by Frank BurnsYou're 47? To me it seems that you are the one acting like a 14 year old ... "shut up" and "get over yourself"? Your vocabulary and mastery of the language is impressive.
Wonderful response Einstein, did it occur to you that this could really be a 14 year old girl.
Are you a 14 year old too? Would that be chronologically or just mentally?
You're of no help, you are simply a crass individual. You're not related to Bowmann are you?
Shutup.
Get over yourself.
You sympathize with her because you probably don't know math yourself. If you did, you would understand what the other people are trying to say in this post. But what can I expect.
And it seems to me that I, along with several other individuals, were much more helpful than you. She went to the library to learn the pythagorian theorem because of us. What did you help her with. Perhaps if she reads your profile she can learn about the wonders of Oregon, alcohol, and baseball. All very important.