Go back
for the genius we have here on RHP...

for the genius we have here on RHP...

Only Chess

VB

Joined
15 Dec 06
Moves
1588
Clock
23 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jusuh
also you are especially bad at mentioning you posted reversed board puzzle.
you are bad at reading POST CLOSED

z

127.0.0.1

Joined
27 Oct 05
Moves
158564
Clock
23 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ice Cold
You either have it, or you don't-LO.
The point Xanthos is being so anal about is that you don't have ELO. You have an ELO rating. It's a matter of semantics.

Von Barbleben. Good puzzles, but they have been posted here before (and correctly at that).

W
Angler

River City

Joined
08 Dec 04
Moves
16907
Clock
23 Jan 07
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
ELO (from american profesor E.A.Elo who invented it) = international rating system or in conversation language - international rating. You can get it, playing in international tournament against opponents with ELO.
I` dont remember exactly (because I got ELO more than 3 years ago in 2003), but I think you need to play at least 8 games against ELO-rated op ...[text shortened]... t them.

P.S. Found more detailed description - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elo_rating_system
The US Chess Federation adopted Elo's system before FIDE.

Anyone that has played in a USCF event has an ELO (rating).

RHP uses Elo's system, too, so all that have completed five games here have an ELO (rating).

Mark Glickman currently runs the USCF ratings, and his Glicko ratings are superior to Elo's; growing numbers of sites and organizations use the Glicko formula, which is a modification of Elo's. Elo's concepts improved, not refuted.

IC

Joined
30 Aug 06
Moves
28651
Clock
23 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
The point Xanthos is being so anal about is that you don't have ELO. You have an ELO rating. It's a matter of semantics.

Von Barbleben. Good puzzles, but they have been posted here before (and correctly at that).
My post was meant to be humor-LO.

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
23 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
Its winning too, but 1.Rc5 (with 2.Qxc7# ) c6 2.Rxc6+ dxc6 3.Qxc6# is more effective.
Anything wrong with 2.Qb8#?

S

Joined
21 Feb 06
Moves
6500
Clock
23 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Meh, I Just saw Qxd7+ Rxd7 Rxd7 Kxd7 Kb7

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
24 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Anything wrong with 2.Qb8#?
Yes - this is more effective.

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
24 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
Yes - this is more effective.
A mate in 3 is more effective than a mate in 2?

I must get those books out again!

K
Chess Warrior

Riga

Joined
05 Jan 05
Moves
24932
Clock
24 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dragon Fire
A mate in 3 is more effective than a mate in 2?

I must get those books out again!
You misunderstood me - I meant that 2.Qb8# is more effective.

DF
Lord of all beasts

searching for truth

Joined
06 Jun 06
Moves
30390
Clock
24 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
You misunderstood me - I meant that 2.Qb8# is more effective.
OK! Nothing wrong with it then?

These puzzles are so easy. What is the point of them and why are we wasting our time doing them? I think the target is

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
24 Jan 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Korch
I`m not using it (LOL) - Its elementary tactics for ppl with ELO.
Electric Light Orchestra?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.