Originally posted by cheater1Which raises several possibilities:
I'm not here to IMPRESS anyone. It is rumored in the chess circles that THESE forums are particularily undisciplined, unruley, and full of UNTRUTHS. I am here to correct that.
1. You are under 30
2. English is not your first language
3. You are a notoriously bad speller
None of these possibilities lend support to your other claims.
In any case, you cannot put yourself forward as the apostle of forum correction for you are manifestly unqualified.
Originally posted by cheater1I'm not here to IMPRESS anyone.
I'm not here to IMPRESS anyone. It is rumored in the chess circles that THESE forums are particularily undisciplined, unruley, and full of UNTRUTHS. I am here to correct that.
And it's a good thing, because I don't think you've impressed anyone here yet. 😛
It is rumored in the chess circles that THESE forums are particularily undisciplined, unruley, and full of UNTRUTHS. I am here to correct that.
Darn, you should have picked the handle of "corrector1".
Please please please. You are a difficult bunch. I am TRYING to tread lightly here as I am under the microscope. Perhaps that is your MASTER plan to get me banned by making me come off as a troll. HA. I'm too smart for that.
STAY ON TOPIC.
One SURE-FIRE way to determine if your opponent is cheating is to use a chess program on them. It works 100% time. Here is why. Assuming both people are using professional strength programs, they will both go DEEP DEEP DEEP into the opening book. Humans simply dont go 20 moves deep into the most obscure variation of the sicilian. TRUST ME. Only computers do that.
Second, if you are using a program and your "legit" opponent checkmates you, then you can bet your very SOUL that they cheated you. See, in the history of the world, there has not been any DOCUMENTED CASE of a human being checkmating a chess program in a game under 1 hour per side. DISCLAIMER: I am assuming you are playing internet "chess" of 3 minutes, 15 minutes, 45 minutes, etc. It AINT REAL chess, games of that speed, hence the quotes.
Please, I dont wanna hear some DOLT provide the Nakamura vs RYBKA game where he decimated it in a 3 minute game. That game was REVEALED to have been SET UP by dumbing down Rybka by giving it a MAXIMUM contempt for draw. Also, Nakamura was given added time, that is why he managed to make something like 270 moves in 180 seconds. HA. .6 seconds per move is ILLEGAL. So there.
Originally posted by cheater1I really do not want to know what you get up to and why you dress up as a troll while you are doing it.
Perhaps that is your MASTER plan to get me banned by making me come off as a troll.
One SURE-FIRE way to determine if your opponent is cheating is to use a chess program on them. It works 100% time. Here is why. Assuming both people are using professional strength programs, they will both go DEEP DEEP DEEP into the opening book. Humans simply dont go 20 moves deep into the most obscure variation of the sicilian. TRUST ME. Only computers do that.
This is a correspondence site. Databases are allowed by the site rules. Therefore most humans here play known opening variations up to and beyond 20 moves deep.
Originally posted by Wulebgrjust a few weeks ago I had a blitz game that went something like 26 moves deep in dragon. I had played it here twice against RN before, so it was relatively easy. in the end the opponent timed out because I knew the theory better. he was obviously familiar with the moves, but didn't have it as fresh in his mind as I did. it was very satisfying.
wrong. i've had several games that went twenty plus moves into theory
I am SO GLAD that I have been ENLIGHTENED on how to STOP CHEATERS on this WEBSITE, because FRANKLY MY overRIDING CoNcErN HAS BEEN how to stop cheaters ON a WEBSITE where ratings MEAN absolutely NOTHING and where IT TOOK some "REHABILITATED" cheater TO REALIZE THAT a PERSON IS using A COMPUTER IF they TAKE three seconds per MOVE FoR book MOVES! I FEEL that MY TIME reading this thread HAS been VALIDATED due TO the NECESSITY OF the information CONTAINED herein.
Originally posted by cheater1Since a single modicum of inaccuracy often serves to remove the need for a complicated explanation, it seems to me that your mental hardware store provides you not with the tools necessary to exercise your mind; hopefully you may become mature enough to go out beyond your restricted imagination and Play😵
Please please please. You are a difficult bunch. I am TRYING to tread lightly here as I am under the microscope. Perhaps that is your MASTER plan to get me banned by making me come off as a troll. HA. I'm too smart for that.
STAY ON TOPIC.
One SURE-FIRE way to determine if your opponent is cheating is to use a chess program on them. It works 100% tim ...[text shortened]... make something like 270 moves in 180 seconds. HA. .6 seconds per move is ILLEGAL. So there.
Originally posted by cheater1BTW, did you ever had the chance to study amongst else some Marovic or Dvoretsky? Or study some oldies like, say, Maroczy? In 1905, Geza offered at Ostende againt Marshall a 26-moves combination seemingly out of the blue -but why?
Please please please. You are a difficult bunch. I am TRYING to tread lightly here as I am under the microscope. Perhaps that is your MASTER plan to get me banned by making me come off as a troll. HA. I'm too smart for that.
STAY ON TOPIC.
One SURE-FIRE way to determine if your opponent is cheating is to use a chess program on them. It works 100% tim ...[text shortened]... make something like 270 moves in 180 seconds. HA. .6 seconds per move is ILLEGAL. So there.
Because his evaluation of the position offered him an understandable concept (Activation of the Queen), a concept he was able to describe it in full to his own self.
And what are the means that Geza used in order to bring up this discription? Maroczy used the Language of Chess -algorithms- in order to proceed from his abstract idea (Activity of the Queen) to the precice algorithm (combination), and he could do it because he was fluent in this Language. He became fluent in this Language because he was studying hard and he was training all the time.
Nowdays a GM understands Dynamism and all he has to do is to train. Nowdays the advanced player has to understand the basics of the Language, because at his/ her level s/he can read allright the Service Manual of his/ her car but s/he cannot write neither the "Catcher in the Rye" nor the "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance". The result itself of each game is nothing if its product through its process cannot teach you the Language;
You are the best proof that my opinion is correct😵
Originally posted by cheater1Now is this the biggest load of crud I've ever read or is it just normal crud?
Consider this my first LEGITIMATE post.
For this discussion, I am ONLY refering to LIVE chess games, NOT correspondence chess. If you are a chess newcomer, forget about trying to detect cheating as 95% people will beat you. Only when you have risen to the level of an above average player, as I have, then will you be able to tell. Remember, I have 30 yea d end game moves. Seemingly PERFECT play.
p.s. Flamers and Trolls KEEP OUT of my TOPIC!!!!!
... and I haven't even bothered to read the rest of this thread.
EDIT: Now I have and I have reached the conclusion that cheater_1 should be renamed liar_1. I had another handle in mind but it would get me banned.