Originally posted by EveRyDayYeah, I figured that move would come. And of course I play Kb3 you follow Qxd5+ and my move is c4.
No I tell you it's my way. I try everything and get many ideas in similar games even from a different opening.
Everyone has to find their own way of play. Mine is just try everything. 🙂
After Qe2 there's one problem.
17...Bb4
You have to play Kb3 and then I avoid queen trade. First by taking on d5 then dodging to d6 with the queen, threatening Be6.
But first 17...Bb4+
Your move.
Originally posted by EveRyDayYes, Nc6 kills there - your descriptions of your moves are pretty brief though - all you said there was that you were going to stack the a-file - I mean that stuff is obvious, but how can you see that many moves ahead, first. And why aren't you even considering any of my threats?
I open up the lines as I said at the beginning I would try to.
19...a4+
Idea is a rook-queen cannon on the a file.
Since you shouldn't take the bishop.
Bxa4 is my move.
Well.
You don't have threats.
I mean what could you do.
The g file is blocked by your own knight. And you don't even a 'heavy piece' (as we say in hungarian) on the g file itself. So it would take you _more_ than two moves to muster up any realy threat. Which is too slow.
I didn't answer your threats because I already stated at Kh8m that it's for killing your only threat - the g file.
And I think saying storming the a file is enough.
And how do I see that far ahead? Well to say modestly - experience.
To be lest modest - fast counting, always playing for sacrifice - which means tons of counting. I played correspondence chess before. At times I count a tactical position for days. And counting for days give you experience. When I plan an unclear sacrifice I count for as many moves as needed - I count every little side variations. And that gives experience. I can't say anything else than what other players would tell you too. First you count every move carefully, longly - then with time seeing the motives in a game is enough for finding the right moves. Here the motive is the a file. Before that the motive is opening up the position and defending your only threat. Because then it might be a draw if opening up was not strong enough, but it's at least a draw for me.
Um. Do you see I was right with b5 now and start 'being susupicious' again, because I saw it that far ahead?
Honestly. Ever seen a master in work?
Or ever watched someone really good at blitz?
It wouldn't take more than 2 seconds from Hikaru Nakamura to see b5.
And don't answer. Now comes the. 'But do you do you.' Well would you beleive me if I said no? 😛
I have F9 somewhere and F10 on my desk. But to be frank - in tactical positions I see the threats faster than them - if they even see some of the sacrifices I play.
You are wrong - again. There are winning tactics programs don't even realize. You mix up two things.
The multi-processored computers Kramnik and the other top GMs use with the ones on a home pc. On my pc F9 haven't seen most of the tactics I won with in correspondence chess. You people idolize programs. Well feel free to. But on the home pcs you own now, they'll never stand up to a master's level.
Originally posted by EveRyDayI'll bet they can get you over 2300 on corry sites though.
You are wrong - again. There are winning tactics programs don't even realize. You mix up two things.
The multi-processored computers Kramnik and the other top GMs use with the ones on a home pc. On my pc F9 haven't seen most of the tactics I won with in correspondence chess. You people idolize programs. Well feel free to. But on the home pcs you own now, they'll never stand up to a master's level.
Why do you keep acting like you know how masters think, play, and analyze?