white mates in 2. I saw this in a newspaper, I've solved over a hundred of these at work over the last whatever months, but this one I can't. Did they make a mistake or am I missing something?
If they meant mate in 3 , it would be too easy.
I had chessmaster look at it and it found a mate in 3 asap, l'm not sure if you can set it up to make it look for a mate in 2 and then have it tell you if it is possible or not.
Mentally reconstructed on Chessmaster XI.
http://img225.imageshack.us/my.php?image=whitematein2nt9.jpg
It's an absurd position that could never occur in a game. Yes, the board is setup correctly hence why it's absurd to trap your bishops n rooks in, and block your own pawns from promoting. Damn you Toronto Star
Originally posted by greenpawn34yeah it's what I want to do, I never post pics/positions/PGNs, etc on the forum, give me the quick n dirty lesson. More quick and less dirty I hope.
[fen]2Q1R1R1/6n1/4B3/5p2/3pNP2/3Pk3/3pNpp1/3Kbrrb[/fen]
I'll try to get right board. (got it - phew).
New rule - if you are going to post a position for people
to look at then fen it.