Originally posted by RomanticusArghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!
I just cannot resist.The castled king loses to the uncastled king.
[pgn][Event "London, England"]
[Site "London, England"]
[Date "1912.??.??"]
[EventDate "?"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Edward Lasker"]
[Black "George Alan Thomas"]
[ECO "A40"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "35"]
1.d4 e6 2. Nf3 f5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. ...[text shortened]... 14. h4+ Kf4 15. g3+ Kf3
16. Be2+ Kg2 17. Rh2+ Kg1 18. Kd2# 1-0
[/pgn]
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOh, Capa and Kasparov and them Masters they could play according to their own rules; but this happens because they spent their youth playing by the rules.
Lol, not only small and light, but a small light, a dim one my friend, and is it any wonder? Who can master the immortal game? for it seems that every time I learn a principle there is quite another waiting to refute that which has been learned.
we are told to castle often and early, Yet Capablanca deliberately delayed his castling as a strategi ...[text shortened]... , and for every one he knows, one that states it may just not be the case!
Greenpawn will soon flip should ye along with Romanticus keep up behaving not; and last thing we want him to do is to start playing bridgeπ΅
Originally posted by RomanticusLovely game
I just cannot resist.The castled king loses to the uncastled king.
[pgn][Event "London, England"]
[Site "London, England"]
[Date "1912.??.??"]
[EventDate "?"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Edward Lasker"]
[Black "George Alan Thomas"]
[ECO "A40"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "35"]
1.d4 e6 2. Nf3 f5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. ...[text shortened]... 14. h4+ Kf4 15. g3+ Kf3
16. Be2+ Kg2 17. Rh2+ Kg1 18. Kd2# 1-0
[/pgn]
Originally posted by Romanticus18.0-0-0 would be by far more classyπ΅
I just cannot resist.The castled king loses to the uncastled king.
[pgn][Event "London, England"]
[Site "London, England"]
[Date "1912.??.??"]
[EventDate "?"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Edward Lasker"]
[Black "George Alan Thomas"]
[ECO "A40"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "35"]
1.d4 e6 2. Nf3 f5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. ...[text shortened]... 14. h4+ Kf4 15. g3+ Kf3
16. Be2+ Kg2 17. Rh2+ Kg1 18. Kd2# 1-0
[/pgn]
Originally posted by RomanticusMaybe he was an efficiency freak. Why move two pieces when you only need to move one?
True.Always thought it a shame he opted for Kd2.
I know think he had foreseen internet chess fora and knew a thread like this would pop up and he did it to help us annoy people like GP π
Originally posted by greenpawn34You made it the forbidden fruit!!
You lot should know your chess history.
The Edward Lasker 'fluke' was a 5 minute game so it does nort count. π
Also:
I've barred my guys in Bates Motel from reading what you nit-wits
are writing in the Chess Forum.
So post away - you are simply howling in the wind. π
They are sure to read it now π΅