Go back
I used to be able to do these

I used to be able to do these

Posers and Puzzles

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
10 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@AThousandYoung

Yep, imperfect, but Yahoo's like to throw stones.

iamatiger

Joined
26 Apr 03
Moves
26771
Clock
10 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@venda

A level maths, I just like puzzles really, not especially good.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
10 Jun 19
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@iamatiger

You have strong analytical and abstract thinking skills. Are you just messing around with variables then giving us your final conclusion?

HandyAndy
Read a book!

Joined
23 Sep 06
Moves
18677
Clock
11 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@iamatiger said
@venda

A level maths, I just like puzzles really, not especially good.
Have you read Martin Gardner's books?

iamatiger

Joined
26 Apr 03
Moves
26771
Clock
12 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@Eladar

I usually have to fiddle around, putting the info into equations on a piece of paper and rearranging them, and yes, I have read some of Martin Gardner’s books, they are great!

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
12 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@iamatiger

I assumed you just found a formula for that distance one somewhere. Were you taught to fiddle with variables then only substitute at the end or is that just a you thing?

venda
Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
86218
Clock
12 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

Another ploy I have sometimes used to solve puzzles I am stuck with is to look at the answer(when given) and work out the formula(e) to get there.
In the meantime there is a formula that seems to work for the type of puzzles below for 2 planets but falls when a 3rd planet is introduced:-
2 planets orbit the sun in the same direction.The 1st planet takes 33 years and the second 9 years for a full orbit.They are now in a straight line with the sun.When will this next occur?
The formula is xy/2(x-y).
They do not have to be in the same position as at the start to be in a straight line.
I think that is the trap.
So you would think that for 3 planets you could calculate the answer for 2 and then just use the same formula to add the 3rd.
But it doesn't work .
Trying it for 6 years , 5 years and 2 years and the answer given in my old book is not what you get doing it this way.
I never quite got to the bottom of it

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
13 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
13 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@venda said
The formula is xy/2(x-y).
That formula doesn't work for planets with orbital periods of 5 years and 6 years. the result is 15, but the answer is 30 years.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
13 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight

Would alignment be in the same exact line or aligned in their elliptical orbit?

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
13 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight said
That formula doesn't work for planets with orbital periods of 5 years and 6 years. the result is 15, but the answer is 30 years.
After 30 years they will be back where they started but the faster
planet will have done one more orbit than the slower. It therefore
will have been aligned once before. After 15 years.

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
13 Jun 19
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wolfgang59 said
After 30 years they will be back where they started but the faster
planet will have done one more orbit than the slower. It therefore
will have been aligned once before. After 15 years.
Does it count if they're on opposite sides of their orbits? I assumed not.

I was only considering them aligned if there was a ray from the sun through both planets.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
13 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight said
Does it count if they're on opposite sides of their orbits? I assumed not.
Yes it does.
If the question were when do they return to the same alignment it would
simply be the lowest common multiple of the two orbital periods.

I'm not convinced that formula is correct though!

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
13 Jun 19
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wolfgang59 said
Yes it does.
If the question were when do they return to the same alignment it would
simply be the lowest common multiple of the two orbital periods.
That's not quite true. With orbital periods of 1 and 3 years, they would align again at 1.5 years

For orbital periods of 5 and 9 years, they will align again after 11.25 years.

venda
Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
86218
Clock
13 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wolfgang59 said
Yes it does.
If the question were when do they return to the same alignment it would
simply be the lowest common multiple of the two orbital periods.

I'm not convinced that formula is correct though!
Correct .If it was the lowest common multiple the problem would be easy.However,I think there were about 3 examples in the book and the formula worked for 2 planets for them all.
The planets do not have to be on either side of the sun which, as I said was the trap.
There must be a formula for "n" number of planets though.
I expect Eladar or Tiger will give us the answer eventually.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.