Go back
I used to be able to do these

I used to be able to do these

Posers and Puzzles

iamatiger

Joined
26 Apr 03
Moves
26771
Clock
15 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

With 1,7,49
We get
J/K = (F-1/S)/(F-1/M) = 8/7
So K=7
T=KFM/2(M-F) = 49/12 = 4 1/12
After 1T , the planes have gone 4+1/12,1/2+1/12,1/12 so they are lined up FSXM
After 2T they have gone twice that, 8+1/6,1+1/6,1/6 so they are FMSX

iamatiger

Joined
26 Apr 03
Moves
26771
Clock
15 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@iamatiger

Here is a good one, the planets are lined up with periods 1, pi, and e. When do they next align?

venda
Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
86199
Clock
16 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@iamatiger said
@iamatiger

Here is a good one, the planets are lined up with periods 1, pi, and e. When do they next align?
Don't understand the question Tiger.
By 1,p1 and e do you mean 3 times ?

iamatiger

Joined
26 Apr 03
Moves
26771
Clock
16 Jun 19
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@venda

I mean the periods of the planets are 1, pi, and e, where pi and e are the fundamental constants. i.e the periods of the planets are 1 year, about 2.718 years, and about 3.14 years. When will they next all be in line with the sun?

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
16 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@iamatiger said
@iamatiger

Here is a good one, the planets are lined up with periods 1, pi, and e. When do they next align?
Since J / K must be rational they will never align

iamatiger

Joined
26 Apr 03
Moves
26771
Clock
16 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight
Correct! This is why there is no simple equation that solves the problem with 3 planets.

venda
Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
86199
Clock
16 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight said
Since J / K must be rational they will never align
Well spotted .
Pi and Eulers constant
I'll try to get a life instead of trying to find simple equations where non exist.
I've enjoyed these discussions and hope I've learned something!!
All the other problems in my old book are far too easy because even I can do them!!

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
16 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@venda said
Well spotted .
Pi and Eulers constant
I'll try to get a life instead of trying to find simple equations where non exist.
I've enjoyed these discussions and hope I've learned something!!
All the other problems in my old book are far too easy because even I can do them!!
Sometimes in math you just need to know the bridge.

I am guessing these formulas assume speed is constant.

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
16 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
Sometimes in math you just need to know the bridge.

I am guessing these formulas assume speed is constant.
they assume perfectly circular, co-planar orbits

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
16 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight said
they assume perfectly circular, co-planar orbits
Ah so not actual orbits at all. I was thinking elliptical orbits with changing velocities.

venda
Dave

S.Yorks.England

Joined
18 Apr 10
Moves
86199
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
Ah so not actual orbits at all. I was thinking elliptical orbits with changing velocities.
I think actual orbits would be far too complex for the man in the street(i.e us)One look at the site mentioned by forkedknight(SYZYGY) convinced me

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
17 Jun 19
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@venda

If the last problem was based on a circle, seems to me the arc tangents being equal would be a nice generalization.

Here is a nice puzzle for those who do not know how to approach it. If Keven can do a job in 5 hours and Larry can do the same job in 3 hours, how long will it take them to do the job working together?

f
Defend the Universe

127.0.0.1

Joined
18 Dec 03
Moves
16687
Clock
17 Jun 19
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
Here is a nice puzzle for those who do not know how to approach it. If Keven can do a job in 5 hours and Larry can do the same job in 3 hours, how long will it take them to do the job working together?
That depends heavily on how much the job can be parallelized. Are you assuming 100%?

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@forkedknight said
That depends heavily on how much the job can be parallelized. Are you assuming 100%?
Yes,no loss of efficiency.

HandyAndy
Read a book!

Joined
23 Sep 06
Moves
18677
Clock
17 Jun 19
Vote Up
Vote Down

@eladar said
Here is a nice puzzle for those who do not know how to approach it. If Keven can do a job in 5 hours and Larry can do the same job in 3 hours, how long will it take them to do the job working together?
Approximately 1 hour and 53 minutes. Keven does 0.333 percent of the job each minute and Larry does 0.555 percent each minute. Together they complete 0.888 per cent per minute. The total job is finished after 112.6 minutes, or 1 hour and 53 minutes (minus a few seconds).

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.