@iamatiger
Here is a good one, the planets are lined up with periods 1, pi, and e. When do they next align?
@iamatiger saidDon't understand the question Tiger.
@iamatiger
Here is a good one, the planets are lined up with periods 1, pi, and e. When do they next align?
By 1,p1 and e do you mean 3 times ?
@iamatiger saidSince J / K must be rational they will never align
@iamatiger
Here is a good one, the planets are lined up with periods 1, pi, and e. When do they next align?
@forkedknight
Correct! This is why there is no simple equation that solves the problem with 3 planets.
@forkedknight saidWell spotted .
Since J / K must be rational they will never align
Pi and Eulers constant
I'll try to get a life instead of trying to find simple equations where non exist.
I've enjoyed these discussions and hope I've learned something!!
All the other problems in my old book are far too easy because even I can do them!!
@venda saidSometimes in math you just need to know the bridge.
Well spotted .
Pi and Eulers constant
I'll try to get a life instead of trying to find simple equations where non exist.
I've enjoyed these discussions and hope I've learned something!!
All the other problems in my old book are far too easy because even I can do them!!
I am guessing these formulas assume speed is constant.
@eladar saidthey assume perfectly circular, co-planar orbits
Sometimes in math you just need to know the bridge.
I am guessing these formulas assume speed is constant.
@forkedknight saidAh so not actual orbits at all. I was thinking elliptical orbits with changing velocities.
they assume perfectly circular, co-planar orbits
@eladar saidI think actual orbits would be far too complex for the man in the street(i.e us)One look at the site mentioned by forkedknight(SYZYGY) convinced me
Ah so not actual orbits at all. I was thinking elliptical orbits with changing velocities.
@venda
If the last problem was based on a circle, seems to me the arc tangents being equal would be a nice generalization.
Here is a nice puzzle for those who do not know how to approach it. If Keven can do a job in 5 hours and Larry can do the same job in 3 hours, how long will it take them to do the job working together?
@eladar saidThat depends heavily on how much the job can be parallelized. Are you assuming 100%?
Here is a nice puzzle for those who do not know how to approach it. If Keven can do a job in 5 hours and Larry can do the same job in 3 hours, how long will it take them to do the job working together?
@forkedknight saidYes,no loss of efficiency.
That depends heavily on how much the job can be parallelized. Are you assuming 100%?
@eladar saidApproximately 1 hour and 53 minutes. Keven does 0.333 percent of the job each minute and Larry does 0.555 percent each minute. Together they complete 0.888 per cent per minute. The total job is finished after 112.6 minutes, or 1 hour and 53 minutes (minus a few seconds).
Here is a nice puzzle for those who do not know how to approach it. If Keven can do a job in 5 hours and Larry can do the same job in 3 hours, how long will it take them to do the job working together?