Originally posted by adam warlockTrue, it's not terribly difficult, but I think it's a nice one because it brings together multiple problem-solving strategies (taking the derivative, sketching the graph to determine the domain/range, polynomial factoring, checking your answer, etc...).
Agreed. But still...
Now, why did I come up with an answer that didn't work, even though the value was in the domain of the function? I think the squaring had something to do with it, but I'm not entirely certain. Thoughts?
Originally posted by PBE6Now, why did I come up with an answer that didn't work, even though the value was in the domain of the function? I think the squaring had something to do with it, but I'm not entirely certain. Thoughts?
True, it's not terribly difficult, but I think it's a nice one because it brings together multiple problem-solving strategies (taking the derivative, sketching the graph to determine the domain/range, polynomial factoring, checking your answer, etc...).
Now, why did I come up with an answer that didn't work, even though the value was in the domain of the fun ...[text shortened]... I think the squaring had something to do with it, but I'm not entirely certain. Thoughts?
Now we're looking for slopes equal to 3/2, so we let y' = 3/2:
3/2 = (1/2)x^(-1/2) + x
Multiplying by 2 to clear fractions, and grouping irrationals on one side:
2x - 3 = x^(-1/2)
Is the bit you got wrong:
3/2=(1/2)x^(-1/2)+x multiplying by 2
3=x^(-1/2)+2x which is equivalent to
2x-3=-x^(-1/2)
Edit: And yes the problem is more educational than I first thought. I didn't solve it all the way through in my head. I just made the derivative and equaled it to 3/2.
Originally posted by PBE6I was really close. I was stuck after I got 4x^3 - 12x^2 + 9x - 1 = 0
It's actually quite cleverly worded, I think. A good example problem, and slightly more difficult that the standard grinder.
Since the slope is just the first derivative of the function, we start there:
y = x^(1/2) + (1/2)x^2
y' = (1/2)x^(-1/2) + x
Now we're looking for slopes equal to 3/2, so we let y' = 3/2:
3/2 = (1/2)x^(-1/2) + x
Multiply ...[text shortened]... QRT(3))/2 works, but (2 + SQRT(3))/2 doesn't. Therefore, the answer is (2 - SQRT(3))/2.
It's not the math that's hard to me, it's just understanding the concept. Like when you should divide, or when you should take the derivative here and stuff like that.
Originally posted by Best101Got any more? These are kinda fun. 🙂
I was really close. I was stuck after I got 4x^3 - 12x^2 + 9x - 1 = 0
It's not the math that's hard to me, it's just understanding the concept. Like when you should divide, or when you should take the derivative here and stuff like that.
It's not the math that's hard to me, it's just understanding the concept. Like when you should divide, or when you should take the derivative here and stuff like that.
You have to understand the meaning of the equations you are looking at. If you are dealing with slope, then you are dealing with the first derivative. If you have been given the derivative, then you just work with the equation given. If you are given the function itself, then you need to take the first derivative and deal with it.
The dividing part was just a technique of solving an equation given one of its zeroes. The dividing part was simply algebra, not calculus.
Calculus was setting up the equation:
3/2 = (1/2)x^(-1/2) + x
After that, it was all algebra.
Originally posted by PBE6Of course 🙂.
Got any more? These are kinda fun. 🙂
Another one I had trouble with.
Find a and b if the tangent line to the function f(x) = x^4 + ax^2 + b at x=1 is y=2x + 3.
@Eladar: I think it may take me some time to get used to.
Work with the info.
You know the point in question because when x=1, y=2(1)+3. In other words, y=5. That means the point (1,5) is on both the line and the graph. More importantly, it is on the graph.
Now work with the slope. We know the slope at x=1 is 2 since the slope of the tangent line is 2. Remember, the slope has to do with the derivative, so we need f'(x)= 4x^3 + 2ax. Knowing the slope at x=1 is 2 means...
f'(1) = 2. Which means...
4(1)^3 + 2(a)(1) = 2
Now simplify:
4 + 2a =2
Solving we find that a = -1
Plugging -1 in for a in f(x) we now get...
f(x) = x^4 - x^2 + b
Since we know that the point (1,5) is on the graph we know that:
f(1) =5
Which means:
1^4 -(1^2) +b = 5
Simplified we get:
b =5
So a = -1 and b =5
I did this as I typed so I may have made a computational error, but the technique in sovling the problem is correct.
Originally posted by EladarWow dude, I hope you did not mess this kid up too much with that awful answer.
What you are loooking at is actually a second derivative problem. f'(6) = F''(6)
When I took the second derivative and solved for f'(6) I got:
f'(6) = f''(6+h) - 2b-6ch
Perhaps there's a substitution for f''(h+6), but I'm not seeing it.
f'(6) = lim h->0 (f(6 + h) - f(6)) / h. So divide by h to get (f(6 + h) - f(6)) / h = a + bh + ch^2, and take h->0 to get f'(6) = a. It's the sort of calculus problem you get in like the first week of class.
Originally posted by EladarIn his original post. He obviously made a typo, because this is exactly the type of problem that is given in the first week or so of calculus, to check whether or not the student understands what exactly a derivative is and how to take a limit.
Excuse me but exactly where did he define f(6+ h) - f(6)?
Originally posted by EladarRight. He made a typo. I did read the whole thread.
According to Best101 he didn't know there was a difference. We cleared it up. If you'd bother to read the other posts, you'd know this.
And your other answer was spot-on. Although I've never before seen the notation you describe. But beyond basic calculus you don't see the prime notation a whole lot, either.
Originally posted by EladarI've just never seen anyone use F = f'.
Function notation, what can I say. I don't think anyone really likes it. My kids would much rather use 'y'.
As far as the typo goes, I think it helped to clarify the point that when dealing with math, especially AP Calculus, you really need to be careful when it comes to notation.
Personally I prefer Leibiniz notation, although I'm starting to shift over to the use of commas to indicate partial derivative as is common with tensors.