Famous Scientists Reject Darwinian Evolution

Originally posted by RJHinds
The creation scientists also gather data over a period of time and do experiments and all that stuff too. They just come to different conclusions than the evilutionists.

I like their conclusions because it agrees with the way I think about it. Evilution seems stupid and not practical too me.

These videos of their work and opinions are sometimes poste ...[text shortened]... roblems with evilution theory should be taught along with intelligent design.

The Instructor

No they don't. Sorry but this is rot. There is clear evidence. Why do you insist on inflicting your fragile faith on us?

Originally posted by DeepThought
No they don't. Sorry but this is rot. There is clear evidence. Why do you insist on inflicting your fragile faith on us?

Your lies will not change the facts.

The Instructor

Originally posted by RJHinds
Your lies will not change the facts.

The Instructor

Yes, "science" in a creationist video is an oxymoron. You know full well the implications in back of all those video's: The destruction of science as we know it in your mad desire to get us back 1000 years to the time of inquisitions and forced conversions to your pathetic religion.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Yes, "science" in a creationist video is an oxymoron. You know full well the implications in back of all those video's: The destruction of science as we know it in your mad desire to get us back 1000 years to the time of inquisitions and forced conversions to your pathetic religion.

You are just ranting about nonsense. Get over it.

The Instructor

Originally posted by RJHinds
You are just ranting about nonsense. Get over it.

The Instructor

Ranting, true, Nonesense No. Remember, Americans have the right to rant.

BTW, what do you think of the fracking thing?

Originally posted by sonhouse
Ranting, true, Nonesense No. Remember, Americans have the right to rant.

BTW, what do you think of the fracking thing?

I believe I already commented unless you are referring to some other fracking thing.

The Instructor

Originally posted by RJHinds
I believe I already commented unless you are referring to some other fracking thing.

The Instructor

I don't think you mentioned whether you are for or against fracking.

Originally posted by sonhouse
I don't think you mentioned whether you are for or against fracking.

If it can be done without contaminating water and causing earthquakes, I am for it.

The Instructor

Originally posted by RJHinds
If it can be done without contaminating water and causing earthquakes, I am for it.

The Instructor

It can't.

Originally posted by sonhouse
It can't.

Maybe science can discover away in the future. So in the meantime the pros and cons have to be weighed by those in the know to determine what should be done.

The Instructor

Originally posted by RJHinds
Maybe science can discover away in the future. So in the meantime the pros and cons have to be weighed by those in the know to determine what should be done.

The Instructor

If only it was that cerebral. It is now governed by money and the gas company electing lawmen who look the other way and change the environmental laws in their favor.

Originally posted by sonhouse
If only it was that cerebral. It is now governed by money and the gas company electing lawmen who look the other way and change the environmental laws in their favor.

Well, we all can vote and can write to our congressman and Senator, so you can't really blame it on those with the money.

The Instructor

Originally posted by RJHinds
Well, we all can vote and can write to our congressman and Senator, so you can't really blame it on those with the money.

The Instructor

Now you are just being naive.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Now you are just being naive.

Not just now.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Now you are just being naive.

I can understand why you don't want to take responsibility.

The Instructor