26 Apr 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainCohen's lawyers confirmed it in court because they were compelled to name Cohen's clients. Were they lying?
Are you delusional? Hannity continues to deny it and Cohen never confirmed it that I'm aware of.
Hannity admits asking Cohen for advice about real estate. If you were a friend of sh76 and asked him for legal advice as a friend he might make a file so he didn't forget the details. If his office got raided by the FBI they might conclude you are a client ...[text shortened]... ings before he speaks. A lot of people are like that. I'll bet you know some of them personally.
27 Apr 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraNone of the links you posted say that. What is your source of info?
Cohen's lawyers confirmed it in court because they were compelled to name Cohen's clients. Were they lying?
27 Apr 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainhttp://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43791164
None of the links you posted say that. What is your source of info?
27 Apr 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraThere you go again. All that article says is there is a "link" to Hannity from Cohen. It doesn't say he is a client. The title of the article says he is a client, but nothing within the article says that.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43791164
It seems like people are doing a lot of assuming without any real proof.
You said Cohen and Hannity admitted Hannity is a client of Cohen's. That clearly is not true. Cohen took the fifth so I know he has not admitted it. It gave Trump critics the chance to point out Trump's hypocrisy for implying Hitlery Clinton was guilty for pleading the fifth. Trump is another guy that doesn't think before he speaks, or tweets.
Every article you posted for me says Hannity denies it. I think you got ahead of yourself by pulling a humy. You should resist the urge to "assume".
Now back to Skripal. This is my best guess as to what you might be thinking. Russia poisoned Skripal with a Russian nerve poison to make it apparent that Russia will poison traitors even though they will never admit it publicly.
If Russia wants certain people to know Russia punishes traitors with Novachok why the damage control by accusing the west of doing it? Is the RT article for convincing Russian citizens their government didn't do that? After all, Putin or whoever is behind it wanted to make it clear that Russia poisons traitors to at least some Russians or they would not have used a Russian nerve poison. Did too many Russians get the message because Putin was overly overt with the Novachok? Is that roughly about what you are thinking?
27 Apr 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainThe article says Hannity is a client of Cohen, as revealed during court proceedings.
There you go again. All that article says is there is a "link" to Hannity from Cohen. It doesn't say he is a client. The title of the article says he is a client, but nothing within the article says that.
It seems like people are doing a lot of assuming without any real proof.
You said Cohen and Hannity admitted Hannity is a client of Cohen's. That cl ...[text shortened]... e because Putin was overly overt with the Novachok? Is that roughly about what you are thinking?
Russia's strategy here is twofold. One, they are warning potential double spies by overtly poisoning Russian nationals abroad. Two, they are publicly denying it for domestic propaganda purposes. In brief, they want potential double spies to think they did it, and they want ordinary Russians to think they didn't do it.
28 Apr 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraOnly the title, not anywhere else.
The article says Hannity is a client of Cohen, as revealed during court proceedings.
Russia's strategy here is twofold. One, they are warning potential double spies by overtly poisoning Russian nationals abroad. Two, they are publicly denying it for domestic propaganda purposes. In brief, they want potential double spies to think they did it, and they want ordinary Russians to think they didn't do it.
I can't figure out a motive for Hannity to lie. It makes more sense to admit he is a client to keep it out of public view. Not admitting he is a client does the opposite. He already said it was about real estate and I don't see why that is so sinister. I think he goofed by talking about attorney-client and it gave the appearance of deceit where there is none.
Can you think of a logical motive for Hannity to lie?
28 Apr 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainHannity looks bad being connected to Cohen, which is a motive for him to lie.
Only the title, not anywhere else.
I can't figure out a motive for Hannity to lie. It makes more sense to admit he is a client to keep it out of public view. Not admitting he is a client does the opposite. He already said it was about real estate and I don't see why that is so sinister. I think he goofed by talking about attorney-client and it gave th ...[text shortened]... pearance of deceit where there is none.
Can you think of a logical motive for Hannity to lie?
28 Apr 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraWhat???
Hannity looks bad being connected to Cohen, which is a motive for him to lie.
Hannity openly admits he is friends with Trump and Cohen. He never tried to hide that. There is no motive.
29 Apr 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainHannity defended Cohen and Trump on his show without disclosing his financial ties to them. This makes him look rather bad in the eyes of non-morons.
What???
Hannity openly admits he is friends with Trump and Cohen. He never tried to hide that. There is no motive.
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraWHAT FINANCIAL TIES?
Hannity defended Cohen and Trump on his show without disclosing his financial ties to them. This makes him look rather bad in the eyes of non-morons.
30 Apr 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraThis makes him look rather bad in the eyes of non-morons.
Hannity defended Cohen and Trump on his show without disclosing his financial ties to them. This makes him look rather bad in the eyes of non-morons.
Are you sure about that?
You wouldn't need to be dumber than a moron to believe Hannity is a Cohen client.
01 May 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorra"Russia's strategy here is twofold. One, they are warning potential double spies by overtly poisoning Russian nationals abroad. Two, they are publicly denying it for domestic propaganda purposes. In brief, they want potential double spies to think they did it, and they want ordinary Russians to think they didn't do it."
The article says Hannity is a client of Cohen, as revealed during court proceedings.
Russia's strategy here is twofold. One, they are warning potential double spies by overtly poisoning Russian nationals abroad. Two, they are publicly denying it for domestic propaganda purposes. In brief, they want potential double spies to think they did it, and they want ordinary Russians to think they didn't do it.
Was that my government's strategy with JFK?
You can't show any financial ties between Hannity and Cohen I take it?
01 May 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainAccording to Hannity, Cohen was involved in his real estate holdings.
"Russia's strategy here is twofold. One, they are warning potential double spies by overtly poisoning Russian nationals abroad. Two, they are publicly denying it for domestic propaganda purposes. In brief, they want potential double spies to think they did it, and they want ordinary Russians to think they didn't do it."
Was that my government's strategy with JFK?
You can't show any financial ties between Hannity and Cohen I take it?
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/apr/22/michael-cohen-sean-hannity-property-real-estate-ben-carson-hud
More info about Hannity's shady real estate dealings involving a lawyer now under criminal investigation:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/apr/24/sean-hannity-real-estate-property-dealer-jeff-brock-fraud-foreclosures
There is no evidence the U.S. government was involved in JFK's assassination.
01 May 18
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraHannity openly said he was seeking advice from Cohen about real estate. That was never a secret. Buying real estate from Brock is not illegal. You make it sound like Hannity conspired with him to do something illegal. That is not the case. Still no motive.
According to Hannity, Cohen was involved in his real estate holdings.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/apr/22/michael-cohen-sean-hannity-property-real-estate-ben-carson-hud
More info about Hannity's shady real estate dealings involving a lawyer now under criminal investigation:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/apr/24/sean-hannity-real-es ...[text shortened]... ud-foreclosures
There is no evidence the U.S. government was involved in JFK's assassination.
There is no evidence that Russia was involved in poisoning Skripal either.
01 May 18
Originally posted by @metal-brainWhy would Hannity get involved with a shady mob lawyer like Cohen if his real estate business is squeaky clean?
Hannity openly said he was seeking advice from Cohen about real estate. That was never a secret. Buying real estate from Brock is not illegal. You make it sound like Hannity conspired with him to do something illegal. That is not the case. Still no motive.
There is no evidence that Russia was involved in poisoning Skripal either.
There is no evidence that Russia was involved in poisoning Skripal either.
Yes, there is.