Site Ideas
05 May 08
09 Jan 09
1 edit
Originally posted by Very RustyIt would be a first if you ever posted an actual site idea in "Site Ideas". Instead, it's all off-topic flaming and personal attacks.
GFY?
Hmmmm... Oh you must mean Good For You!
GFY='s Good For You
Thank You "No One" 😉
BTW, even Metallica's clan leader acknowledges that a change in the LAME CLAN CHALLENGE SCORING SYSTEM would be desirable. see http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=106123&page=3
09 Jan 09
How about this idea? Every clan votes on who they think should play in a championship clan challenge. At the end of every year, they play in the BCS Championship game. No tournament, no fairness at all. Just don't call your clan Boise State, you will never play in the clan chamionship, even if you win every game for about 20 years.
09 Jan 09
Originally posted by no1marauderActually, you are mistaken. I didn't ever say a change in the scoring system was desirable. I said I didn't care if they changed it or not. Then I explained what parts of your ideas I liked and which parts I disagreed with. The fact of the matter is I don't care if or how they change the scoring method, as long as it is done fairly for everyone, and we have time to study it prior to implementation of a new plan.
It would be a first if you ever posted an actual site idea in "Site Ideas". Instead, it's all off-topic flaming and personal attacks.
BTW, even Metallica's clan leader acknowledges that a change in the LAME CLAN CHALLENGE SCORING SYSTEM would be desirable. see http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=106123&page=3
09 Jan 09
Originally posted by shortcircuitMaybe you should read your own posts; in the one I linked to your "edit" had a lengthy discussion of how the present system could be improved IYO. You are backpedalling NOW, but that doesn't change the fact that in that particular post you recognized the defects in the present system.
Actually, you are mistaken. I didn't ever say a change in the scoring system was desirable. I said I didn't care if they changed it or not. Then I explained what parts of your ideas I liked and which parts I disagreed with. The fact of the matter is I don't care if or how they change the scoring method, as long as it is done fairly for everyone, and we have time to study it prior to implementation of a new plan.
10 Jan 09
Originally posted by no1marauderMaybe you should read what you wrote. I did not say I was in favor of changing anything. I said I was not opposed to changing the system and there were ways it could be improved. Furthermore, I said I did not agree with your plan in whole and offered suggestions to change it. If you want to quote me, do it correctly.
Maybe you should read your own posts; in the one I linked to your "edit" had a lengthy discussion of how the present system could be improved IYO. You are backpedalling NOW, but that doesn't change the fact that in that particular post you recognized the defects in the present system.
I also have no need to backpeddle as you say because I could care less if it is changed or not. Unlike you, I will play the game and try to win it. You would rather pick up your ball and go home and sulk about how you would like the game to be, if it didn't suit you.
10 Jan 09
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderYou have already proven yourself a liar!
Maybe you should read your own posts; in the one I linked to your "edit" had a lengthy discussion of how the present system could be improved IYO. You are backpedalling NOW, but that doesn't change the fact that in that particular post you recognized the defects in the present system.
I want you to think back to what you said Cashinov said about me on two different occasions which he did not. Now back peddle your way out of that one "No One". 😛
10 Jan 09
Originally posted by Very RustyWant to stay on topic for a change?
You have already proven yourself a liar!
I want you to think back to what you said Cashinov said about me on two different occasions which he did not. Now back peddle your way out of that one "No One". 😛
numb1, let's petition Russ for a vote again. Hell, we both know votes mean bugger-all here, but maybe it will bring the LCCSS subject to his attention again...
BTW, did you see my proposal about bonus points on the previous page?
10 Jan 09
Originally posted by no1marauderNo1, YOU are the one flaming..
It would be a first if you ever posted an actual site idea in "Site Ideas". Instead, it's all off-topic flaming and personal attacks.
BTW, even Metallica's clan leader acknowledges that a change in the LAME CLAN CHALLENGE SCORING SYSTEM would be desirable. see http://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=106123&page=3
That's at least how I perceive your endless repetition of the label that you put on the current clan system..
That's how I perceive your endless attacks on people who are not thinking exactely like you..
(I guess) it's true that people don't want the All Time Total Points as leading indicator (just like me), but you seem to see it as a fact that everybody simply wants your option as a replacement of the current system. You seem to feel that your opinion is the only true solution and you seem not to accept any other opinion, and in many occasions call it "BS" when somebody seems not to think exactely like you...
Just PM Russ / sent in FeedBack to put it to a vote and get it over with, but pls quit your endless crusade and annoying labelling of the current system..
10 Jan 09
Originally posted by AmsterdamnPutting capitals on the LAME CLAN CHALLENGE SCORING SYSTEM is "flaming"??? 🙄
No1, YOU are the one flaming..
That's at least how I perceive your endless repetition of the label that you put on the current clan system..
That's how I perceive your endless attacks on people who are not thinking exactely like you..
(I guess) it's true that people don't want the All Time Total Points as leading indicator (just like me), but you see ...[text shortened]... ver with, but pls quit your endless crusade and annoying labelling of the current system..
This is the Site Ideas forum, BTW.
10 Jan 09
6 edits
Originally posted by CrowleyI was making a point to "No Ones" comment to shortcircuit, that he has been proven a liar, I have been staying on topic, but it came up in the discussion, as he was not quite truthful in saying what shortcircuit actually said about the point system. Do you follow that, or do you need someone to explain it to you. You seem to love to pretend you don't know what I am talking about.
Want to stay on topic for a change?
numb1, let's petition Russ for a vote again. Hell, we both know votes mean bugger-all here, but maybe it will bring the LCCSS subject to his attention again...
BTW, did you see my proposal about bonus points on the previous page?
Especially when I am right!
EDIT: "No One" isn't even subscriber silly, he can't VOTE!!
IF the Vote means bugger all why bother?
"No One" isn't even in a clan.
I don't know if you are or not, but doesn't seem like Metallica the Number 1 Clan for 2008 has played you that I can see. 😛 I just noticed you are in two clans. Do you play many games? Say in a month how many clan games would you actually play?