12 Jun 10
Originally posted by AmsterdamnI must disagree. The inherent problem with the current system is sandbagging.
"you have hit the nail on the head"
A means of marking players whose currnet ranking is significantly below their top ranking would put extreme pressue on their clan leader to match their player not against a comparably ranked but a comparably skilled competitor.
It's simple and I only see upside to this proposal.
my2sons
12 Jun 10
1 edit
Originally posted by AmsterdamnLook at Spinning Stars.. they lose most.. and are 3rd, just by playing more games than you.. so if that's gonna be the way, you will see clans on top who play most games.. and that will not change the top 10.. unless you wanna limit the max amount of games... etc etc etc..
[b]And YOUR TER suggestion of implemention of having to match within 100 points of TER would be ideal for you, player lowers rating 500 points from 1800 to 1300 for 12 months..
I don't see how that can be done so easily..
And wins most..
Look at Spinning Stars.. they lose most.. and are 3rd, just by playing more games than you.. so e helping those clan leaders who seem not be willing to look more closely at the challenges..[/b]
How is it that you place Spinning Stars in 3rd place?? They are over 300 net points in the hole both in YTD net points, and All time net points. We are in 17th place at the moment in YTD Net points with 180+ net points to the positive. And we're in 12th place for all time net points with 2420+. I have no idea how you come up with the spinning stars are in 3rd place. Please explain??
13 Jun 10
Originally posted by coquetteGreat colours indeed!
REC'D (Highly recommended)
Azure for 6 points below
Teal for 8 points below
Magenta for 10 points below
Taupe for 12 points below
Eggshell glistening avocado green hazel for 14 points below
etc!!!
But we'd need an intelligent discussion of each Robbie to ensure we avoided social, political and sporting biases. I boldly suggest a neo-Mccarthist style of Robbies to avoid accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason without proper regard for evidence. I further suggest shades of pinko Robbie from pure The King and I God-made-me-do-it White Robbie to a deep Mount Lofty Sparkling Shiraz Red Robbie.
13 Jun 10
Originally posted by KingDavid403Patrick is referring to ytd total points accumulated in 2010.
[b]Look at Spinning Stars.. they lose most.. and are 3rd, just by playing more games than you.. so if that's gonna be the way, you will see clans on top who play most games.. and that will not change the top 10.. unless you wanna limit the max amount of games... etc etc etc..
How is it that you place Spinning Stars in 3rd place?? They are over ...[text shortened]... . I have no idea how you come up with the spinning stars are in 3rd place. Please explain??[/b]
13 Jun 10
2 edits
Originally posted by my2sonsOkay, Well I personally only go by net points to count any clans performance. And I think Patricks idea of having clans listed on the clan pages by net points is a good idea. All time net points I think would be best. It wouldn't change much for the top 5 clans either. But that's just my personal opinion.
Patrick is referring to ytd total points accumulated in 2010.
It also would be nice if they had some kind of award or trophy or some kind of recognition for the clan that ends up in first place each year for net points, I think.
13 Jun 10
Originally posted by KingDavid403I agree with this aspect of the proposals,but not those that have the potential to be used to impune players simply to make life easier for clan leaders
Okay, Well I personally only go by net points to count any clans performance. And I think Patricks idea of having clans listed on the clan pages by net points is a good idea. All time net points I think would be best. It wouldn't change much for the top 5 clans either. But that's just my personal opinion.
It also would be nice if they had som ...[text shortened]... ind of recognition for the clan that ends up in first place each year for net points, I think.